ArticleTurkish archives of pediatrics2024
The Association of Sociodemographic Factors and Utilization of Diabetes Technologies with Diabetes Management: An Investigation in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes.
Article in Turkish archives of pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Determination of the relationship between mothers' carbohydrate counting knowledge and glycemic control in children with type 1 diabetes.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2026Article
- Parental Low Level of Education and Single-Parent Families as Predictors of Poor Control of Type 1 Diabetes in Children Followed in French Guiana.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We aimed to investigate the relationship between sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, as well as the utilization of diabetes technologies, with diabetes management in individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Our study included 134 cases diagnosed with T1D who were followed for at least 1 year with T1D. Of the cases, 67.2% were using insulin pens as their insulin regimen, while 37.8% were using insulin pumps. The rate of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) usage was 29.9%. The rate of CGM usage was 5% in families with low income levels. Glycosylated hemoglobin A1c(HbA1c) level of children with working mothers was found to be higher compared to those with non-working mothers (median 9.2% vs. 8%; P = .009). Cases with 3 or more siblings had higher HbA1c levels compared to those with 2 or fewer siblings (median 8.7% vs. 8.1%; P = .044).The median HbA1c was 8.7% in cases using insulin pens and checking fingerstick blood glucose (SMBG); 8.3% in cases using insulin pumps and SMBG; 7.6% in cases using insulin pens with CGM, and 7.5% in cases using insulin pumps with CGM (P = .003). The utilization of insulin pumps with CGM in T1D cases exhibited lower HbA1clevels. Similarly, even the usage of insulin pens with CGM demonstrated improved diabetes management. Maternal employment and having a higher number of siblings may negatively affect diabetes management due to increased caregiver burden. We believe that personalized healthcare delivery tailored to the individual needs of T1D patients based on family and clinical characteristics could have positive effects on diabetes management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.