Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39440328›Full record

ReviewJournal of medicine and life2024

The impact of arachnoid structures on skull-base meningioma surgical management: a radiological analysis and narrative review.

Gheorghe Ungureanu, Alexandru Florian, Stefan Ioan Florian

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of medicine and life, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gheorghe UngureanuIuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Alexandru FlorianIuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Stefan Ioan FlorianIuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The presence of intact arachnoid membranes between skull base meningiomas and critical neurovascular structures is crucial for predicting surgical outcomes, understanding tumor development and growth, and planning the feasibility of tumor resection or the need for adjuvant treatments. While neurosurgeons often utilize the subarachnoid cisterns to enhance access to these tumors and facilitate their removal, a comprehensive review aimed at health professionals involved in the diagnosis and treatment of this complex pathology, including radiologists, neurologists, oncologists, ophthalmologists, and neurosurgeons is still lacking. This study aims to summarize the interaction between skull base meningiomas, subarachnoid cisterns, and arachnoid membranes, emphasizing their significance in both the diagnosis and treatment of this pathology. By conducting a thorough radiological assessment of skull base meningiomas, correlating these findings with intraoperative observations, and reviewing relevant literature, we summarize the critical relationship between skull base meningiomas and the surrounding subarachnoid spaces. We concisely describe how arachnoid structures influence tumor growth and interaction with neurovascular elements. We advocate for the inclusion of tumor-arachnoid relationships in the medical literature concerning the treatment of these tumors. A better understanding and description of the interaction between tumors and neurovascular structures will aid in planning and attempting safer treatments, minimizing surgical risks, predicting potential tumor progression, and the need for adjuvant treatments.

Indexed as

ArachnoidMeningiomaSkull Base NeoplasmsHumansMeningeal Neoplasmsarachnoidmeningeal neoplasmsmeningiomaskull base neoplasmssubarachnoid space

Identifiers

PMID39440328
PMCPMC11493166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.