ArticleNational science review2024
Nature of the lunar far-side samples returned by the Chang'E-6 mission.
Article in National science review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- The bombardment history on the lunar farside revealed byScience advances · 2026Article
- Chang'e-6 farside anorthosites indicate hemispherically comparable magma ocean solidification.Nature communications · 2026Article
- KREEP materials recorded in impact glasses of Chang'e-6 regolith returned from the South Pole-Aitken Basin.Fundamental research · 2026Article
- Chang'E-6 reveals solar wind-dependent HScience advances · 2026Article
- Lunar chronology model with the Chang'e-6 farside samples and implications for the early impact history.Science advances · 2026Article
- Saturation of space weathering in shaping lunar regolith particle morphology.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Isotopic evidence for volatile loss driven by South Pole-Aitken basin-forming impact.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Particle Morphology Controls the Bulk Mechanical Behavior of Far-Side Lunar Regolith from Chang'e-6 Samples and Deep Learning.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- Impactor relics of CI-like chondrites in Chang'e-6 lunar samples.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Million-year solar wind irradiation recorded in chang'E-5 and chang'E-6 samples.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Revealing Lunar Far-Side Polarization Characteristics via FeO Abundance Distribution Correlations with Ground-Based Polarimetric Data.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The source and thermal driver of young (<3.0 Ga) lunar volcanism.Science advances · 2025Article
- A more reduced mantle beneath the lunar South Pole-Aitken basin.Nature communications · 2025Article
- A shallow mantle source for the Chang'e 5 lavas reveals how top-down heating prolonged lunar magmatism.Science advances · 2025Article
- Magnetic signatures and origins of ferromagnetic minerals in Chang'e-6 lunar farside soils.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Sulfur isotopes from the lunar farside reveal global volatile loss following the giant impact.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Water abundance in the lunar farside mantle.Nature · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Chang'E-6 (CE-6) mission successfully achieved return of the first samples from the far side of the Moon. The sampling site of CE-6 is located in the South Pole-Aitken (SPA) basin-the largest, deepest and oldest impact basin on the Moon. The 1935.3 g of CE-6 lunar samples exhibit distinct characteristics compared with previous lunar samples. This study analyses the physical, mineralogical, petrographic and geochemical properties of CE-6 lunar scooped samples. The CE-6 soil has a significantly lower bulk density (0.983 g/cm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.