ReviewProceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center)2024
A review of professionalism in surgery.
Review in Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Surgical Professionalism: Development and Educational Suitability Assessment of a Combined Situational Judgment Test and Guided Reflection among General Surgery Residents in Indonesia.Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism · 2026Article
- Understanding Surgeon Professionalism in Indonesia: A Qualitative Study in a Multicultural and Resource-Limited Context.Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism · 2025Article
- Factors associated with professionalism among ophthalmology medical residents.Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Physicians, and specifically surgeons, have unique expectations and responsibilities regarding professionalism. Further, surgeons interact with multiple different groups of people including surgical peers, trainees, other physicians, ancillary care partners, and patients. Communication between all of these groups must be respectful, appropriate, and effective, even in the high-stress environment of surgery. Norms of professional behavior are evolving to reflect the practices of the current era as well as the increasingly diverse surgical workforce. Thus, multiple surgical societies as well as the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education have incorporated professionalism as a core pillar of surgeon evaluation. While professionalism has typically been modeled, the trait is now being more formally taught in medical education pathways. Future directions for professionalism in surgery include validated modules, more formalized surgeon review, linkage to credentialing, and reimbursement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.