Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39440078›Full record

ReviewProceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center)2024

Efficacy, safety, and impact on procedural outcomes of local anesthesia in endoscopic submucosal dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hazem Abosheaishaa, Abdelmalek Abdelghany, Abdallfatah Abdallfatah, Doha Mohamed, Ammar Ayman Bahbah, Islam Mohamed, Khaled Elfert, Ahmed E Salem, Azizullah Beran, Ahmad Madkour and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Hazem AbosheaishaaIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5581-8702
Abdelmalek AbdelghanyFaculty of Medicine, October 6 University, Giza, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5399-1795
Abdallfatah AbdallfatahFaculty of Medicine, October 6 University, Giza, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5670-2234
Doha MohamedFaculty of Medicine, October 6 University, Giza, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2924-145X
Ammar Ayman BahbahFaculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Menoufia, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6150-9343
Islam MohamedDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Missouri - Columbia, Columbia, Missouri, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0740-8960
Khaled ElfertSchool of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5554-6252
Ahmed E SalemMaimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8204-8451
Azizullah BeranDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Ahmad MadkourFaculty of Medicine, Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt.
Mohammad Al-HaddadDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has revolutionized the treatment of early stage gastrointestinal cancers. However, ESD can be associated with increased postprocedural pain and higher complication rates. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of local anesthesia. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted to identify relevant randomized controlled trials investigating the effect of local anesthesia in ESD procedures. The Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials was used to assess study quality. A meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4, with summary measures expressed as pooled odds ratios (OR) or mean differences with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Four randomized controlled trials with 296 patients undergoing ESD procedures were included. The use of local anesthesia did not significantly impact procedural time (mean difference = -2.05, 95% CI = -9.29, 5.18, I Conclusion: Our study found that the use of local anesthesia did not significantly affect the procedural time of ESD. However, it effectively reduced postoperative pain in some trials with no risk of increased incidence of adverse events.

Indexed as

Bupivacaineendoscopic submucosal dissectionintraoperative painlidocainelocal anesthesia

Identifiers

PMID39440078
PMCPMC11492676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.