ArticleJournal of Cancer2024
CCT6A functions as promising diagnostic biomarker and promotes cell proliferation in colorectal cancer.
Article in Journal of Cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The CCT6A paradigm: biomarker potential and therapeutic challenges in oncology and beyond.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Chaperonin in health and disease.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Review
- Association between Urinary-Extracellular-Vesicle-Enriched Proteome Dynamics and Oncological Outcomes Following Concurrent Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- Molecular characterization and prognostic modeling of liquid-liquid phase separation-related genes in osteosarcoma based on single-cell sequencing and weighted gene co-expression network analysis.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
- Chaperonin-containing tailless complex polypeptide 1 subunit 6A negatively regulates autophagy and protects colorectal cancer cells from cisplatin-induced cytotoxicity.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.