Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39440030›Full record

ArticleZooKeys2024

Description of

Sándor Hornok, Jenő Kontschán, Ai Takano, Yasuhiro Gotoh, Alexandre Hassanin, Vuong Tan Tu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ZooKeys, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sándor HornokDepartment of Parasitology and Zoology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Budapest, Hungary University of Veterinary Medicine Budapest Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1125-5178
Jenő KontschánPlant Protection Institute, HUN-REN Centre for Agricultural Research, Budapest, Hungary Plant Protection Institute, HUN-REN Centre for Agricultural Research Budapest Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8274-4238
Ai TakanoDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Joint Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and The United Graduate School of Veterinary Science, Yamaguchi University, Yamaguchi, Japan Yamaguchi University Yamaguchi Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5919-3738
Yasuhiro GotohDepartment of Bacteriology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan Kyushu University Fukuoka Japan.
Alexandre HassaninInstitut Systématique Evolution Biodiversité, Sorbonne Université, Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, Paris, France Sorbonne Université Paris France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4905-8540
Vuong Tan TuInstitute of Ecology and Biological Resources, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, Hanoi, Vietnam Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology Hanoi Vietnam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5915-865X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Historically, for more than one and a half centuries, only one so-called "long-legged bat tick" species, i.e.,

Indexed as

ChiropteraMyotisalticraniatusMyotislanigernew speciesPholeoixodesSoutheast Asiataxonomy

Identifiers

PMID39440030
PMCPMC11494211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.