Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39439986›Full record

ArticleCurrent opinion in colloid & interface science2019

Poiseuille and extensional flow small-angle scattering for developing structure-rheology relationships in soft matter systems.

Avanish Bharati, Steven D Hudson, Katie M Weigandt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current opinion in colloid & interface science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Rheology of Gels and Yielding Liquids.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Materials Research & Measurement Needs for Ceramics Additive Manufacturing.Journal of the American Ceramic Society. American Ceramic Society · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Avanish BharatiCenter for Neutron Research, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, USA.
Steven D HudsonMaterials Science and Engineering Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, USA.
Katie M WeigandtCenter for Neutron Research, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, USA.

Funding

Intramural NIST DOC 9999-NIST
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the rheoscattering community has grown, so has the breadth of experiments both in terms of materials systems, and also in terms of flow types and analysis approaches. In this review, we seek to highlight important recent developments in rheoscattering that go beyond simple shear measurements. In particular, this review will focus on Poiseuille flow and extensional flow small-angle scattering and results from recent experiments that lead to the development of structure-function relationships in a wide variety of soft materials.

Indexed as

Capillary rheometerExtensional flowFlow-induced structureFlow-SAS/WASMixed flowNonlinear deformationNonsimple flowsPoiseuille flowRheoSANSRheoSAXSShearShear cellSlit rheometer

Identifiers

PMID39439986
PMCPMC11494688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.