Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39439965›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2024

Effect of smoking status on immunotherapy for lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Dachen Luo, Dongmei Yang, Dan Cao, Zonglian Gong, Fang He, Yaqin Hou, Shan Lin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. The impact of smoking on lung cancer patients.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Review
  13. The Current Roadmap of Lung Cancer Biology, Genomics and Racial Disparity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dachen Luo *Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan, China.
Dongmei Yang *Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan, China.
Dan CaoDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan, China.
Zonglian GongDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan, China.
Fang HeDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan, China.
Yaqin HouDepartment of Pharmacy, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan, China.
Shan LinDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Recent studies have yielded conflicting results regarding the relationship between smoking history and the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for advanced lung cancer. While some studies have suggested that smoking may enhance the response to immunotherapy in patients with lung cancer, other findings indicate the contrary. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to thoroughly examine this association. Methods: We searched the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases for clinical trials comparing immunotherapy with conventional chemotherapy as the primary treatment for advanced lung cancer. A random effects model was used to synthesize hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for overall survival (OS). We also conducted predefined subgroup analyses to investigate the efficacy disparities between never-smokers and smokers who were administered immunotherapy alone or in combination with chemotherapy, as well as the differences between former and current smokers under similar treatment modalities. Results: Our analysis included data from 17 Phase III clinical trials involving 10,283 patients. The findings indicate that immunotherapy benefits both smokers and never-smokers with lung cancer or non-small cell lung cancer, yielding pooled HRs for OS of 0.74 (95% CI: 0.59-0.92) and 0.73 (95% CI: 0.67-0.80), respectively. A significant interaction effect was not observed (HR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.77-1.24, p Conclusion: Our findings suggest that smoking status does not affect the effectiveness of immunotherapy for lung cancer treatment. However, additional high-quality clinical trials are needed to confirm this conclusion. Systematic review registration: https://inplasy.com/register/, identifier INPLASY2023110058.

Indexed as

immune checkpoint inhibitorlung cancermeta-analysissmoking statussystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39439965
PMCPMC11493588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.