Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39439921›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society of New Zealand2023

New Zealand travellers to high-risk destinations for arbovirus infection make little effort to avoid mosquito bites.

Sherif E Ammar, Mary Mclntyre, Michael G Baker, Simon Hales

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sherif E AmmarDepartment of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4428-5154
Mary MclntyreDepartment of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.
Michael G BakerDepartment of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.
Simon HalesDepartment of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has been no local transmission of arbovirus disease recorded in New Zealand to date. However, in the past two decades, there have been increasing numbers of overseas-acquired cases of arbovirus infections in New Zealand, mainly dengue, Zika, chikungunya and Ross River viruses. The repeated introduction of these viruses to the immunologically naïve New Zealand population through viraemic travellers represents a potential risk for local transmission by resident or new mosquito vectors. This study assessed the extent to which these imported arbovirus disease cases used the bite-avoidance measures recommended by the New Zealand Ministry of Health between 2001-2017. The majority of notified cases reported making little effort to avoid mosquito bites even during high-risk periods and outbreaks. This suggests that the infection of New Zealand travellers might be due to underestimation or unawareness of the risk of travel-related mosquito-borne diseases. New Zealand travellers to endemic or epidemic areas, mainly in the Asia-Pacific region, should be informed about ongoing risks according to season and epidemic activity at the destination and updated on the latest disease situation and new trends. This would reduce the likelihood of pathogen introduction and, therefore, local transmission of arbovirus infection in New Zealand.

Indexed as

arbovirusdengueinfectious diseasesmosquitoesNew Zealandprecautionary measurespreventiontravel

Identifiers

PMID39439921
PMCPMC11459766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.