Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39439919›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society of New Zealand2023

Outcomes from the New Zealand Tenancy Tribunal after a review of policy on residential housing methamphetamine contamination.

Claudia Denisse Sanchez Lozano, Chris Wilkins, Marta Rychert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Claudia Denisse Sanchez LozanoSHORE & Whāriki Research Centre, College of Health, Massey University, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5839-0414
Chris WilkinsSHORE & Whāriki Research Centre, College of Health, Massey University, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5564-6226
Marta RychertSHORE & Whāriki Research Centre, College of Health, Massey University, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4170-1615

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The New Zealand policy response to methamphetamine contamination of housing has resulted in reduction of public housing stock, award of significant remediation costs and evictions. The New Zealand Tenancy Tribunal (NZTT) has adjudicated methamphetamine contamination disputes between tenants and landlords without specific guidance in legislation. A 2018 scientific review by the Chief Science Advisor prompted a significant increase in the contamination threshold. To evaluate the outcomes from this policy change, we compared 195 NZTT orders following the threshold increase with 685 orders from before the threshold increase. Landlords remain as major applicants to the NZTT. Cases involving public housing tenancies dramatically decreased from 33% (pre threshold increase) to none. Mention of baseline testing and methamphetamine test results became more prominent after the threshold increase. The average remediation costs decreased from NZ$10,300 to NZ$3,500 per order, perhaps reflecting fewer rooms of houses requiring remediation under the new threshold. Applicants and respondents continued to support their claims based on different scientific thresholds and reports. Discrepancies between adjudicators' interpretations of test results and the threshold to apply continued to generate inconsistencies in NZTT decisions. Legislative and regulatory guidance is still needed to consistently and equitably resolve these disputes.

Indexed as

change in policydoctrine of precedentmethamphetamine and drug policyMethamphetamine contamination in propertiesNew Zealand Tenancy Tribunalpublic health and methamphetaminetenancy contamination

Identifiers

PMID39439919
PMCPMC11459788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.