ArticleJournal of the Royal Society of New Zealand2023
Outcomes from the New Zealand Tenancy Tribunal after a review of policy on residential housing methamphetamine contamination.
Article in Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The New Zealand policy response to methamphetamine contamination of housing has resulted in reduction of public housing stock, award of significant remediation costs and evictions. The New Zealand Tenancy Tribunal (NZTT) has adjudicated methamphetamine contamination disputes between tenants and landlords without specific guidance in legislation. A 2018 scientific review by the Chief Science Advisor prompted a significant increase in the contamination threshold. To evaluate the outcomes from this policy change, we compared 195 NZTT orders following the threshold increase with 685 orders from before the threshold increase. Landlords remain as major applicants to the NZTT. Cases involving public housing tenancies dramatically decreased from 33% (pre threshold increase) to none. Mention of baseline testing and methamphetamine test results became more prominent after the threshold increase. The average remediation costs decreased from NZ$10,300 to NZ$3,500 per order, perhaps reflecting fewer rooms of houses requiring remediation under the new threshold. Applicants and respondents continued to support their claims based on different scientific thresholds and reports. Discrepancies between adjudicators' interpretations of test results and the threshold to apply continued to generate inconsistencies in NZTT decisions. Legislative and regulatory guidance is still needed to consistently and equitably resolve these disputes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.