ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2024
T-cell engagers: model interrogation as a tool to quantify the interplay of relative affinity and target expression on trimer formation.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gustave Roussy Immune Score Validation in Patients Treated with Bispecific CD3 T-cell Engagers in Phase I Clinical Trials.Cancer research communications · 2026Article
- Can we cure autoimmunity?Current opinion in immunology · 2026Review
- Structure and function of therapeutic antibodies approved by the US FDA in 2024.Antibody therapeutics · 2025Review
- Opto-CD28-REACT: optogenetic co-stimulatory receptor activation on non-engineered human T cells.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
T-cell engagers (TCEs) represent a promising therapeutic strategy for various cancers and autoimmune disorders. These bispecific antibodies act as bridges, connecting T-cell receptors (TCRs) to target cells (either malignant or autoreactive) via interactions with specific tumour-associated antigens (TAAs) or autoantigens to form trimeric synapses, or trimers, that co-localise T-cells with target cells and stimulate their cytotoxic function. Bispecific TCEs are expected to exhibit a bell-shaped dose-response curve, with a defined optimal TCE exposure for maximizing trimer formation. The shape of the dose-response is determined by a non-trivial interplay of binding affinities, exposure and antigens expression levels. Furthermore, excessively low binding to the TCR may reduce efficacy, but mitigate risk of over-stimulating cytokine secretion or induce effector cell exhaustion. These inevitable trade-off highlights the importance of quantitatively understanding the relationship between TCE concentration, target expression, binding affinities, and trimer formation. We utilized a mechanistic target engagement model to show that, if the TCE design parameters are close to the recommended ranges found in the literature, relative affinities for TCR, TAA and target expression levels have qualitatively different, but predictable, effects on the resulting dose-response curve: higher expression levels shift the curve upwards, higher antigen affinity shifts the curve to the left, and higher TCR affinity shifts the curve upwards and to the left.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.