ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces2024
Uncertainty Quantification of Linear Scaling, Machine Learning, and Density Functional Theory Derived Thermodynamics for the Catalytic Partial Oxidation of Methane on Rhodium.
Article in The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence Informed Hydrogel Biomaterials in Additive Manufacturing.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Modeling Heterogeneous Catalysis Using Quantum Computers: An Academic and Industry Perspective.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate and complete microkinetic models (MKMs) are powerful for anticipating the behavior of complex chemical systems at different operating conditions. In heterogeneous catalysis, they can be further used for the rapid development and screening of new catalysts. Density functional theory (DFT) is often used to calculate the parameters used in MKMs with relatively high fidelity. However, given the high cost of DFT calculations for adsorbates in heterogeneous catalysis, linear scaling relations (LSRs) and machine learning (ML) models were developed to give rapid estimates of the parameters in MKM. Regardless of the method, few studies have attempted to quantify the uncertainty in catalytic MKMs, as the uncertainties are often orders of magnitude larger than those for gas phase models. This study explores uncertainty quantification and Bayesian Parameter Estimation for thermodynamic parameters calculated by DFT, LSRs, and GemNet-OC, a ML model developed under the Open Catalyst Project. A model for catalytic partial oxidation of methane (CPOX) on Rhodium was chosen as a case study, in which the model's thermodynamic parameters and their associated uncertainties were determined using DFT, LSR, and GemNet-OC. Markov Chain Monte Carlo coupled with Ensemble Slice Sampling was used to sample the highest probability density (HPD) region of the posterior and determine the maximum of the a posteriori (MAP) for each thermodynamic parameter included. The optimized microkinetic models for each of the three estimation methods had quite similar mechanisms and agreed well with the experimental data for gas phase mole fractions. Exploration of the HPD region of the posterior further revealed that adsorbed hydroxide and oxygen likely bind on facets other than Rhodium 111. The demonstrated workflow addresses the issue of inaccuracies arising from the integration of data from multiple sources by considering both experimental and computational uncertainties, and further reveals information about the active site that would not have been discovered without considering the posterior.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.