Observational studyFarmaceuticos comunitarios2024
[Validation of the JH-SEFAC Questionnaire on Knowledge on Insulin Management by Patients with Diabetes in Community Pharmacies].
Observational study in Farmaceuticos comunitarios, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of pharmaceutical intervention on the management of insulin pens: a study in community pharmacy.Farmaceuticos comunitarios · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To review and validate a questionnaire on knowledge of injectable insulin management (JH-SEFAC) by patients with diabetes for use in community pharmacies. Methods: Study design: cross-sectional observational in Spanish community pharmacies during the first half of 2023. Inclusion criteria: patients with diabetes, of legal age, on insulin treatment. Questionnaire design: a nominal group of community pharmacists reviewed and piloted the initial questionnaire to determine its feasibility. It was approved by the CEIC of Aragón (PI22/375). Content validation: by a multidisciplinary group of experts in diabetes, using an ad hoc evaluation questionnaire of 10 questions (Likert scale of 1-5). Reliability: by means of the internal consistency index (Cronbach's alpha) and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Reproducibility (test/retest): the results of the questionnaire administered twice 2-3 weeks apart to the group of patients were compared. Pharmacists members of the SEFAC Diabetes Working Group collaborated. Sample: calculated in 127 subjects (95% CI and precision of 10%). Results: 20 community pharmacies from 13 autonomous communities included 131 patients. The expert assessment was 4.52 out of 5 (90.4%). The Keiser-Meyer-Olkin test was 0.626 and Bartlett's test was significant (p<0.001). The Cronbach's alpha of the global questionnaire was 0.804 and the ICC was 0.902. The mean score of the questionnaire was 15.98 out of 31 points. Conclusions: The JH-SEFAC questionnaire was validated to evaluate the management of insulin injectables, providing community pharmacists with a valuable tool for therapeutic education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.