ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2024
Ideal Time to Conduct a Pharmacokinetic Investigation After Delivery to Fully Capture the Effect of Pregnancy on Drug Exposure.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pharmacokinetics of Efavirenz in Pregnancy and Postpartum with and Without First-line Tuberculosis Drugs: Results from IMPAACT P1026s.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2026Article
- Psychedelic therapy and postpartum depression: priorities and prospects.Therapeutic advances in psychopharmacology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The World Health Organization is pushing to accelerate the study of new human immunodeficiency virus drugs in pregnant women. However, regulatory guidelines do not specify when to conduct pharmacokinetic studies in postpartum women. This knowledge gap carries the potential to jeopardize the outcomes and conclusions of clinical trials aiming to study the effect of pregnancy on drug exposure. We used physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling along with clinical data to determine the time needed after delivery for drug exposure to return to prepregnancy levels. Methods: A literature review was conducted to collect physiological parameters of pregnant and postpartum women. Regression analyses were performed to derive equations describing the parameters trajectory throughout pregnancy and post partum to inform our PBPK model. Published pharmacokinetic data in pregnant and postpartum women were used for the model verification. The PBPK model was subsequently applied to investigate pharmacokinetic changes throughout pregnancy and post partum. Results: In agreement with the clinical data the PBPK model was able to describe the different effects of pregnancy on drug exposure, with bictegravir showing the largest reduction in exposure (approximately 50%) during the third trimester while ritonavir and raltegravir showing the lowest (approximately 30%). The successfully verified PBPK model predicted that all evaluated antiretrovirals mostly return to prepregnancy exposure 4 weeks after delivery. Conclusions: Pharmacokinetic investigations on hepatically cleared drugs should not be conducted before the fifth week after delivery to fully characterize the effect of pregnancy on drug exposure. Because physiological changes remain after delivery, early measurements can underestimate the pregnancy effect on pharmacokinetics, leading to suboptimal dosing recommendations during pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.