Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39439740›Full record

ArticleNeurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.)2024

Connectivity of Fronto-Temporal Regions in Syntactic Structure Building During Speaking and Listening.

Laura Giglio, Daniel Sharoh, Markus Ostarek, Peter Hagoort

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Compositional Complexity in Text and Images.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Building hierarchically nested structure by rapid neural sequences.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Neural encoding of semantic structures during sentence production.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Laura GiglioMax Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5369-4331
Daniel SharohMax Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6941-5680
Markus OstarekMax Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1138-7904
Peter HagoortMax Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7280-7549

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The neural infrastructure for sentence production and comprehension has been found to be mostly shared. The same regions are engaged during speaking and listening, with some differences in how strongly they activate depending on modality. In this study, we investigated how modality affects the connectivity between regions previously found to be involved in syntactic processing across modalities. We determined how constituent size and modality affected the connectivity of the pars triangularis of the left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG) and of the left posterior temporal lobe (LPTL) with the pars opercularis of the LIFG, the left anterior temporal lobe (LATL), and the rest of the brain. We found that constituent size reliably increased the connectivity across these frontal and temporal ROIs. Connectivity between the two LIFG regions and the LPTL was enhanced as a function of constituent size in both modalities, and it was upregulated in production possibly because of linearization and motor planning in the frontal cortex. The connectivity of both ROIs with the LATL was lower and only enhanced for larger constituent sizes, suggesting a contributing role of the LATL in sentence processing in both modalities. These results thus show that the connectivity among fronto-temporal regions is upregulated for syntactic structure building in both sentence production and comprehension, providing further evidence for accounts of shared neural resources for sentence-level processing across modalities.

Indexed as

comprehensionconnectivityfMRIlanguageproductionsyntax

Identifiers

PMID39439740
PMCPMC11495677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.