Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39439699›Full record

ArticleArchives of medical science : AMS2024

Prevalence of polypharmacy in the older adult population within primary care in Portugal: a nationwide cross-sectional study.

Pedro Augusto Simões, Luiz Miguel Santiago, José Augusto Simões

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of medical science : AMS, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pedro Augusto SimõesFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Beira Interior; ARS Centro, USF Pulsar, Portugal.
Luiz Miguel SantiagoFaculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra; CEISUC - Centre for Health Studies and Research of the University of Coimbra, Portugal.
José Augusto SimõesUniversity of Beira Interior; CINTESIS - Centre for Research in Health Technologies and Service, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Polypharmacy is commonly defined as the simultaneous use of five or more medications; however, there is a lack of consensus regarding the most appropriate definition. It is a significant predictor of morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of polypharmacy in the population of older adults attending primary care in Portugal and to identify associated sociodemographic and clinical factors. Material and methods: We conducted a cross-sectional, analytical study in primary care centres from the five Portuguese healthcare administrative regions and the two autonomous regions. We used a random sample of 757 older adult patients provided by the information department of the ministry of health (SPMS) and family doctors from the autonomous regions. Data collection occurred in March 2018. The variables utilised were sociodemographic characteristics, clinical profile and medication. For each patient, polypharmacy was measured either by the concurrent use of ≥ 5 drugs or by the median number of drugs at the time of data collection. Logistic regression analyses were performed to determine associations between polypharmacy and other variables. Results: Polypharmacy (≥ 5 drugs) was present in 77% of the sample. A cut-off of over the median number of drugs was present in 55%. The likelihood of having polypharmacy increased significantly with age (OR = 1.05 (1.02-1.08)), number of chronic health problems (OR = 1.24 (1.07-1.45)) and number of prescribers (OR = 4.71 (3.42-6.48)). Cardiovascular, metabolic and musculoskeletal medications were the most commonly involved in polypharmacy. Conclusions: Polypharmacy was a very common occurrence in Portugal. Future primary healthcare policies should address polypharmacy.

Indexed as

agedmultimorbiditypolypharmacy

Identifiers

PMID39439699
PMCPMC11493025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.