ReviewCureus2024
Prognostic Factors and Outcome Measures After Rituximab Therapy in Central Nervous System Vasculitis: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Given the growing popularity of Rituximab (Rmab) treatment as a potential substitute for cyclophosphamide, we conducted this review to determine aspects related to Rmab therapy in central nervous system vasculitis (CNSV) patients, aiming to establish both the beneficial and detrimental consequences of Rmab while providing clinical guidance for managing patients' conditions. This systematic review was prepared following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases were utilized to investigate Rmab treatment in CNSV from January 2015 to May 2024. The research question was structured using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, and Study Design (PICOS) criteria. Case series with only three or more unique cases, prospective or retrospective non-randomized studies, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were addressed. The initial evaluations were performed in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. After removing duplicate entries, 177 publications were obtained, and 41 were chosen for full-text assessment. The review then incorporated information gathered from 27 studies, including 4 case series, 15 non-randomized cohorts, and 8 RCTs. Rmab is generally regarded as effective for CNSV therapy. Given its success, induction Rmab therapy is now frequently employed as maintenance therapy for CNSV patients. Rmab is a viable option for the induction of remission and maintenance treatment, with a successful reduction in relapse rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.