ArticleCureus2024
Incongruent Treatment Recommendations Between Left and Right Hip Bone Mineral Densities.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective The official position of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) is that either hip site can be scanned with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) imaging. Whether there is a difference in guideline-based treatment recommendations between hip sites has not previously been assessed. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of all individuals who underwent DXA imaging at a single center from September 1, 2018, to October 31, 2019. Women aged ≥ 40 years old and men aged ≥ 50 years old were included. Individuals without bilateral hip measurements or who were on osteoporosis treatment were excluded. The 10-year probability of fracture using the fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) was calculated for each hip when the worst T-score was in the osteopenia range. Results Of the included participants, 10% (n = 151/1505) had incongruent treatment recommendations (ITR) between the left and right hips. In the ITR group, 70% (n = 106) had osteopenia and 30% (n = 45) had osteoporosis. Age was the only significant risk factor for ITR overall (OR: 1.06, 95% CI: 1.04-1.09). In the osteopenia group, however, age (OR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.13-1.21), history of parental hip fracture (OR: 3.16, 95% CI: 1.65-6.05), and glucocorticoid use (OR: 4.18, 95% CI: 1.6-11.0) were associated with ITR. In the osteoporosis group, the right hip (femoral neck and total) T-scores were significantly lower compared to the left. Conclusion Measuring bone mineral density on both hips changes treatment recommendations in 10% of people. This was more likely in those with osteopenia who were older, had a parental history of hip fracture, or were on glucocorticoids. Measuring both hips did not add time or cost to patient care. Given the minimal disadvantages to measuring both hips, there should be a strong consideration to change the current guidance of only measuring one hip.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.