ArticleCureus2024
Awareness of Interventional Radiology Among Medical Students.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Scoping Review of Interventional Radiology Curricula for Medical Students and Correlation with Kern's Six-Step Framework for Curriculum Development.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Review
- Exploring awareness, perceptions, and career interest in interventional radiology among medical students in Multan, Pakistan: a cross-sectional survey.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInterventional radiology (IR) plays a crucial role in modern medicine, offering minimally invasive treatments for various conditions. Despite its growing significance, the awareness and understanding of IR among medical students are often limited.
objectiveThis research aims to evaluate the level of awareness of IR among medical students at the University of Gezira in Sudan Methodology: This study is a descriptive cross-sectional study that involved 174 medical students from batches 39 and 40. Data was collected through a structured questionnaire designed to assess participants' awareness and perception of IR. The questionnaire was carried out through Google Forms platform, and the data was analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25 (Released 2017; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States). The chi-square test was used to compare qualitative data, and a p-value of <0.05 was considered significant.
resultsFemales were 97 (55.7%) of the participants, while males were 77 (44.3%). The educational level found that 85 (48.9%) are finalists (fifth year) and 89 (51.1%) have graduated. A total of 75 (43.1%) of the medical students considered themselves having poor knowledge about IR. A total of 163 (93%) have confirmed that mandatory radiology course is important to be added to the curriculum of the medical school. Furthermore, 149 (85.6%) are familiar with the concept of angioplasty, and 60 (34.5%) have seen patients treated by an interventional radiologist. Most of the students are not considering IR as a career mainly due to the lack of knowledge or fear from radiological exposure.
conclusionMedical students' awareness and perception of IR is inadequate which may adversely affect their consideration of pursuing it as a career path. Educational interventions aimed at enhancing medical students' knowledge and interest in IR may be needed to improve patient outcomes and tackle healthcare challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.