ReviewCureus2024
Surgical Intervention Outcome for Patients With Acute Vision Loss Due to Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The endonasal endoscopic surgical approach to challenging pediatric frontal sinus inflammatory lesions.Journal of surgical case reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS) is a severe type of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) characterized by a high risk of acute vision loss resulting from the affection of optic nerves. This vision loss results from direct pressure upon the optic nerve by the sinus tissues and bone degradation. This is why early involvement of a professional is significant so as not to result in a permanent disability. This systematic review and meta-analysis will analyze the efficacy of surgical operations in enhancing visual outcomes in patients with acute vision loss due to AFRS. A systematic search was carried out based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus with the keywords "acute vision loss," "allergic fungal rhinosinusitis," and "surgical intervention." The studies included patients who developed AFRS-related acute vision loss, those assessing the outcomes of the surgical interventions, and those published in English. Two separate researchers extracted data and conducted quality assessments. The data synthesis process employed the R studio software (Posit, Boston, MA). The identified studies for the review constituted 12 and involved 320 patients. The mean pooled event rate regarding acute vision loss of AFRS patients was 33.1%. Ear, nose, and throat surgeries, including functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) and optic nerve decompression, had a mean pooled success in vision recovery of 68%. Early treatment and utilization of other types of corticosteroids were utilized to enhance the results. Hence, early and proper surgery like FESS, optic nerve decompression, and corticosteroid treatment have better visual prognosis in AFRS patients. Standard early diagnosis and management guarantee the prevention of irreversible blindness, which stresses the need for an interdisciplinary approach and further studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.