ReviewCureus2024
Role of Adjuvants in Enhancing the Efficacy and Duration of Anesthesia Blocks: A Comprehensive Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A comparative study of dexmedetomidine versus clonidine as additives for spinal anesthesia: A meta-analysis of clinical trials.Medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Intrathecal adjuvants in spinal anaesthesia: Balancing evidence, safety, and regulatory gaps.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2026Article
- Impact of dexmedetomidine preconditioning on analgesic and postoperative recovery in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2026Article
- Comparing additive effect of dexmedetomidine and neostigmine to bupivacaine on postspinal anesthesia cesarean section induced pain intensity: A health promotion Approach.Journal of education and health promotion · 2026Article
- Enhancing Caudal Analgesia in Children: A Narrative Review of Clonidine and Dexmedetomidine as Adjuvants.Cureus · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anesthesia blocks are integral to modern pain management, offering targeted and effective relief for various surgical and procedural interventions. These techniques, including regional and peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs), involve the administration of local anesthetics to specific body areas, either through epidural, spinal, or direct nerve injections. While effective, incorporating adjuvants, substances added to local anesthetics, can significantly enhance their efficacy and prolong their duration. Adjuvants such as opioids, corticosteroids, alpha-2 agonists, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are used to amplify analgesic effects, reduce the need for general anesthesia, and improve postoperative outcomes. This review explores the role of adjuvants in optimizing anesthesia blocks, examining their mechanisms of action, clinical benefits, and safety considerations. Adding adjuvants can lead to enhanced pain control, reduced dosage of local anesthetics, and fewer systemic side effects. By integrating adjuvants into anesthesia practice, clinicians can achieve more precise and sustained pain management, tailoring approaches to individual patient needs and specific procedural demands. This comprehensive review highlights current evidence on using adjuvants, their impact on anesthesia block effectiveness, and future research directions. Understanding the role of adjuvants is crucial for improving patient outcomes and advancing pain management techniques in various surgical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.