Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39439546›Full record

ArticleDEN open2025

The outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition for small focal liver lesions measuring ≤2 cm.

Yuichi Takano, Naoki Tamai, Masataka Yamawaki, Jun Noda, Tetsushi Azami, Fumitaka Niiya, Fumiya Nishimoto, Naotaka Maruoka, Tatsuya Yamagami, Masatsugu Nagahama

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in DEN open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yuichi TakanoDepartment of Internal Medicine Division of Gastroenterology, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital Kanagawa Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6803-9460
Naoki TamaiDepartment of Internal Medicine Division of Gastroenterology, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital Kanagawa Japan.
Masataka YamawakiDepartment of Internal Medicine Division of Gastroenterology, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital Kanagawa Japan.
Jun NodaDepartment of Internal Medicine Division of Gastroenterology, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital Kanagawa Japan.
Tetsushi AzamiDepartment of Internal Medicine Division of Gastroenterology, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital Kanagawa Japan.
Fumitaka NiiyaDepartment of Internal Medicine Division of Gastroenterology, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital Kanagawa Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2248-8655
Fumiya NishimotoDepartment of Internal Medicine Division of Gastroenterology, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital Kanagawa Japan.
Naotaka MaruokaDepartment of Internal Medicine Division of Gastroenterology, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital Kanagawa Japan.
Tatsuya YamagamiDepartment of Internal Medicine Division of Gastroenterology, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital Kanagawa Japan.
Masatsugu NagahamaDepartment of Internal Medicine Division of Gastroenterology, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital Kanagawa Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) for focal liver lesions has gained attention as an alternative to percutaneous biopsy. Although the outcomes of EUS-TA for focal liver lesions have been reported to be favorable, no studies have focused on small focal liver lesions (≤2 cm). The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of EUS-TA for small focal liver lesions (≤2 cm). Methods: The details of EUS-TA performed for focal liver lesions between 2016 and 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. The outcomes were compared between cases involving ≤2 cm lesions and those involving >2 cm lesions. The primary outcomes were diagnostic ability and adverse events. Results: EUS-TA for focal liver lesions was performed in 109 cases. Of the 109 cases, 32 (29.3%) involved ≤2 cm lesions and 77 (70.6%) involved >2 cm lesions. Right lobe lesions and transduodenal puncture were significantly fewer in the ≤2 cm group. There were no significant differences in needle gauge, needle type, or number of punctures between the groups. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy rates were 96.8%, 100%, and 96.8%, respectively, in the ≤2 cm group and 97.4%, 100%, and 97.4%, respectively, in the >2 cm group, with no significant differences between the groups. There was no difference in adverse events between the groups (0% in the ≤2 cm group and 2.3% in the >2 cm group). Conclusions: EUS-TA for small focal liver lesions measuring ≤2 cm has favorable outcomes, which are similar to those for lesions measuring >2 cm.

Indexed as

endoscopic ultrasoundfocal liver lesionintrahepatic cholangiocarcinomametastatic liver tumortissue acquisition

Identifiers

PMID39439546
PMCPMC11494021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.