Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39439496›Full record

ReviewExploration (Beijing, China)2024

Recent advances in bacteria-based platforms for inflammatory bowel diseases treatment.

Jiaoying Lu, Xinyuan Shen, Hongjun Li, Juan Du

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Exploration (Beijing, China), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Polysaccharide-Based Encapsulation of Microbes for Enhanced Microbial Therapy.Polymer science & technology (Washington, D.C.) · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jiaoying LuDepartment of Gastroenterology The First Affiliated Hospital School of Medicine Zhejiang University Hangzhou China.
Xinyuan ShenNational Key Laboratory of Advanced Drug Delivery and Release Systems College of Pharmaceutical Sciences Zhejiang University Hangzhou China.
Hongjun LiNational Key Laboratory of Advanced Drug Delivery and Release Systems College of Pharmaceutical Sciences Zhejiang University Hangzhou China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1765-8445
Juan DuDepartment of Gastroenterology The First Affiliated Hospital School of Medicine Zhejiang University Hangzhou China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a recurring chronic inflammatory disease. Current treatment strategies are aimed at alleviating clinical symptoms and are associated with gastrointestinal or systemic adverse effects. New delivery strategies are needed for the treatment of IBD. Bacteria are promising biocarriers, which can produce drugs in situ and sense the gut in real time. Herein, we focus on recent studies of engineered bacteria used for IBD treatment and introduce the application of engineered bacteria in the diagnosis. On this basis, the current dilemmas and future developments of bacterial delivery systems are discussed.

Indexed as

diagnosisdrug deliveryengineered bacteriainflammatory bowel diseases

Identifiers

PMID39439496
PMCPMC11491310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.