ArticleExploration (Beijing, China)2024
A self-assembled, genetically engineered, irradiated tumor cell debris vaccine.
Article in Exploration (Beijing, China), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Autophagy-enhanced hybrid pyroptotic vesicles as personalized vaccines for cancer immunotherapy.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Article
- Biosynthetic OMVs with endogenous GM-CSF loading for ultrasound-triggered in situ cancer vaccination.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Article
- Mechanobiological Dynamics-Inspired Mechanomodulatory Biomaterials.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- A γ-ray responsive hydrogel "blasting fuse" for prevention of postoperative breast cancer recurrence and metastasis via radio-immunotherapy.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
- A self-assembled, genetically engineered, irradiated tumor cell debris vaccine.Exploration (Beijing, China) · 2024Article
- Nano-Assisted Radiotherapy Strategies: New Opportunities for Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vaccine-based therapeutics for cancers face several challenges including lack of immunogenicity and tumor escape pathways for single antigen targets. It has been reported that radiotherapy has an in situ vaccine effect that provides tumor antigens following irradiation, helping to activate antigen-presenting cells (APCs). Herein, a new vaccine approach is developed by combining genetically engineered irradiated tumor cell debris (RTD) and hyaluronic acid (HA), termed HA@RTD. A cancer cell line is developed that overexpresses granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). A hydrogel was developed by covalent conjugation of HA with RTD proteins that acted as a potent vaccine system, the effects which were probed with T cell receptor sequencing. The engineered vaccine activated antitumor immunity responses and prevented tumor growth in mice even with a single immunization. HA@RTD vaccine efficacy was also assessed in therapeutic settings with established tumors and in combination with immune checkpoint blockade.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.