Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39439474›Full record

ReviewJournal of the Royal Society of New Zealand2024

Key questions on the evolution and biogeography of New Zealand alpine insects.

Thomas R Buckley, Robert J B Hoare, Richard A B Leschen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Prospects for Complete DNA Barcode Coverage of the New Zealand Insect Fauna.Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Evolutionary biogeography of Aotearoa.Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Thomas R BuckleyManaaki Whenua - Landcare Research, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3076-4234
Robert J B HoareManaaki Whenua - Landcare Research, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1080-5315
Richard A B LeschenManaaki Whenua - Landcare Research, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8549-8933

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New Zealand alpine environments host a diverse assemblage of insect lineages, with virtually every major insect group represented. The modern mountain ranges of New Zealand are relatively young and large areas of habitat above the tree line have only been in continual existence for the past one million years. We discuss the geological history and physical characteristics of New Zealand alpine environments and the resulting selective pressures placed on insect species. Some notable alpine taxa and previous faunistic research is highlighted. We discuss examples where single lineages have colonised the alpine zone and contrast these with larger radiations of alpine species which in some cases are the result of multiple colonisation events. The age of most alpine lineages is consistent with the young geological age of the mountains, nevertheless there are some much older alpine lineages of uncertain evolutionary history. We show that alpine species have employed a very broad range of morphological, physiological, and behavioural adaptations to survive in the alpine zone, and new studies are starting to unpick their genomic basis. Finally, we look to the future and assess threats to the unique New Zealand alpine insect fauna.

Indexed as

Adaptationcold toleranceColeopteraLepidopteramontanespeciation

Identifiers

PMID39439474
PMCPMC11459838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.