ReviewInternational journal of medical sciences2024
Evolution and advances in endovascular mechanical thrombectomy of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis.
Review in International journal of medical sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment in symptomatic pediatric cerebral venous sinus thrombosis.Neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Refractory deep cerebral venous thrombosis managed by mechanical thrombectomy and balloon angioplasty: A case report.Radiology case reports · 2026Article
- Association of the p.Phe155del mutation in SERPINC1 with changed antithrombin function and increased risk of venous thromboembolism: clinical and functional observations.Thrombosis journal · 2025Article
- Cerebral Venous Thrombosis:Current Status and Challenges.Brain and behavior · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) is a rare type of stroke and standard treatment involves anticoagulation. However, for some special CVST patients who are ineligible for anticoagulation or refractory to conservative treatment, endovascular treatment (EVT) may be an effective option. Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is a commonly used treatment. Compared with anticoagulation treatment alone, MT may result in additional procedure-related complications, however, many studies have shown that it has a high rate of vessel recanalization and lower incidence of related complications in arterial large vessel occlusion stroke. In addition, the applicability of MT in children, patients with deep cerebral thrombosis, and patients with bleeding before treatment has been reported. MT combined with intravascular thrombolysis (IVT) and other multimodal therapeutic strategies, also has a good curative effect, and further research is needed to compare and optimize different treatment strategies. Owing to the low incidence of CVST, randomized controlled clinical trials with a large sample size to explore the safety and effectiveness of MT are scarce. In addition, devices specifically designed for cerebral venous sinus and effective endovascular therapies are currently not well-established. This article summarizes different endovascular instruments and multimodal therapies for cerebral venous thrombosis. We also discuss the limitations, prospects, prognostic factors, and applications in special cases of interventional thrombectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.