Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39439438›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2024

Managing Subscapularis in Shoulder arthroplasty.

Hariharan Mohan, Gillian Smith, Amir Khan, Bijayendra Singh

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hariharan MohanDepartment of Trauma & Orthopaedics, Medway NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Gillian SmithDepartment of Trauma & Orthopaedics, Medway NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Amir KhanDepartment of Trauma & Orthopaedics, Medway NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Bijayendra SinghDepartment of Trauma & Orthopaedics, Medway NHS Foundation Trust, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Managing subscapularis forms an integral part of shoulder arthroplasty and the ideal technique for subscapularis release and repair during shoulder arthroplasty is still under debate. The three common techniques are tenotomy, peel and lesser tuberosity osteotomy (LTO). Current literature from clinical studies does not show any difference in the outcome between the 3 techniques. However biomechanical studies favour LTO. Subscapularis sparing approach can be an alternative solution allowing early rehabilitation but needs further clinical studies to assess its longterm benefits. Failure of subscapularis repair in anatomical shoulder replacement can lead to pain, loss of movements, instability and loosening of implants. Treatment options include revision repair, tendon transfer, reconstruction with allograft tendon and revision to reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). Repairing subscapularis in RSA can improve rotations and stability, however it also has adverse biomechanical effects on deltoid. Absence of subscapularis repair is seen to affect stability only in medialised implant designs, while no such effects are seen in lateralised design implants.

Indexed as

Anatomical shoulder arthroplastyLesser tuberosity osteotomyReverse shoulder arthroplastySubscapularis

Identifiers

PMID39439438
PMCPMC11491720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.