Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39439304›Full record

ReviewJournal of primary care & community health

Immersive Technologies in Healthcare: An In-Depth Exploration of Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality in Enhancing Patient Care, Medical Education, and Training Paradigms.

Arham I Iqbal, Ali Aamir, Abdullah Hammad, Hafiza Hafsa, Abdul Basit, Malik Olatunde Oduoye, Muhammad Wajeeh Anis, Shaheer Ahmed, Mohammad Ijlal Younus, Sarwat Jabeen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Digital Psychiatry with Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality: Recent Advances and Limitations.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Arham I IqbalDow International Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan.
Ali AamirDow Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan.
Abdullah HammadDow International Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan.
Hafiza HafsaDow Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan.
Abdul BasitDow Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan.
Malik Olatunde OduoyeThe Medical Research Circle, Goma, Bukavu, The Democratic Republic of the Congo.ORCID 0000-0001-9635-9891
Muhammad Wajeeh AnisDow International Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID 0009-0003-0710-0899
Shaheer AhmedDow Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan.
Mohammad Ijlal YounusDow International Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan.
Sarwat JabeenDow Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVirtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) are rapidly gaining traction in healthcare, offering transformative opportunities for patient care, medical education, and therapeutic interventions. Despite their potential, challenges remain regarding the implementation and integration of these technologies into existing healthcare practices.

objectiveThis review aims to explore the current applications of VR and AR in healthcare, particularly focusing on their roles in enhancing patient care and medical training, as well as identifying research gaps that hinder their widespread adoption.

methodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted across 2 primary databases, PubMed, and Google Scholar. The search was restricted to peer-reviewed articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from 2000 to 2024. Reference lists of included articles were also examined for additional relevant studies. Inclusion criteria focused on empirical studies addressing the use of VR and/or AR in patient care or medical training, while editorial pieces, non-peer-reviewed sources, and unrelated studies were excluded. A total of 17 900 search results were identified on Google Scholar and 300 on PubMed, leading to the inclusion of 89 articles in this review.

resultsThe findings indicate that VR and AR technologies significantly enhance patient experiences and medical training, providing immersive and interactive environments for learning and practice. However, notable challenges include integration issues with existing electronic health record systems, the need for appropriate implementation models, and a lack of substantial evidence supporting the clinical efficacy of AR-assisted procedures.

conclusionWhile VR and AR hold considerable promise in revolutionizing healthcare practices, further research is essential to address existing gaps, particularly regarding implementation strategies, user acceptance, and empirical evaluation of patient outcomes and training effectiveness. Understanding the needs of healthcare professionals and patients will be critical to maximizing the impact of these technologies in clinical settings.

Indexed as

Augmented RealityEducation, MedicalPatient CareVirtual RealityHumansaugmented realitymedical educationmedical trainingpatient carevirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID39439304
PMCPMC11528804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.