Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39439296›Full record

ArticleThe New phytologist2025

Herbarium specimens reveal a cryptic invasion of polyploid Centaurea stoebe in Europe.

Christoph Rosche, Olivier Broennimann, Andriy Novikov, Viera Mrázová, Ganna V Boiko, Jiří Danihelka, Michael T Gastner, Antoine Guisan, Kevin Kožić, Marcus Lehnert and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The New phytologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Christoph RoscheInstitute of Geobotany, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, 06108, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4257-3072
Olivier BroennimannDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, 1015, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9913-3695
Andriy NovikovState Museum of Natural History, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Lviv, 79008, Ukraine.ORCID 0000-0002-0112-5070
Viera MrázováDepartment of Botany, Charles University, Prague, 12801, Czech Republic.
Ganna V BoikoM.G. Kholodny Institute of Botany, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, 01601, Ukraine.ORCID 0000-0002-6327-1794
Jiří DanihelkaDepartment of Botany and Zoology, Masaryk University, Brno, 60200, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-2640-7867
Michael T GastnerInformation and Communication Technology Cluster, Singapore Institute of Technology, Singapore, 828608, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-1097-8833
Antoine GuisanDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, 1015, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3998-4815
Kevin KožićInstitute of Geobotany, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, 06108, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4738-0242
Marcus LehnertInstitute of Geobotany, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, 06108, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7202-7734
Heinz Müller-SchärerDepartment of Biology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, 1700, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0936-1470
Dávid U NagyInstitute of Geobotany, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, 06108, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7742-4459
Ruben RemelgadoGerman Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, 04103, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9871-5703
Michał RonikierW. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, 31-512, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-7652-6787
Julian A SelkeInstitute of Geobotany, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, 06108, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5345-2412
Natalia M ShiyanM.G. Kholodny Institute of Botany, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, 01601, Ukraine.ORCID 0000-0001-8144-5623
Tomasz SuchanW. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, Kraków, 31-512, Poland.
Arpad E ThomaInstitute of Geobotany, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, 06108, Germany.ORCID 0009-0001-5518-9969
Pavel ZdvořákHerbarium collections, Charles University, Prague, 12801, Czech Republic.
Patrik MrázDepartment of Botany, Charles University, Prague, 12801, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-1415-070X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous plant species are expanding their native ranges due to anthropogenic environmental change. Because cytotypes of polyploid complexes often show similar morphologies, there may be unnoticed range expansions (i.e. cryptic invasions) of one cytotype into regions where only the other cytotype is native. We critically revised herbarium specimens of diploid and tetraploid Centaurea stoebe, collected across Europe between 1790 and 2023. Based on their distribution in natural and relict habitats and phylogeographic data, we estimated the native ranges of both cytotypes. Diploids are native across their entire European range, whereas tetraploids are native only to South-Eastern Europe and have recently expanded their range toward Central Europe. The proportion of tetraploids has exponentially increased over time in their expanded but not in their native range. This cryptic invasion predominantly occurred in ruderal habitats and enlarged the climatic niche of tetraploids toward a more oceanic climate. We conclude that spatio-temporally explicit assessments of range shifts, habitat preferences and niche evolution can improve our understanding of cryptic invasions. We also emphasize the value of herbarium specimens for accurate estimation of species´ native ranges, with fundamental implications for the design of research studies and the assessment of biodiversity trends.

Indexed as

CentaureaIntroduced SpeciesPolyploidyDiploidyEcosystemEuropePhylogeographyCentaurea stoebe (spotted knapweed)climatic nichecolonization abilitycryptic invasionherbarium specimenspolyploidyrange expansionruderal habitats

Identifiers

PMID39439296
PMCPMC11617643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.