Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39439222›Full record

Observational studyJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle2024

Body composition derangements in lung cancer patients treated with first-line pembrolizumab: A multicentre observational study.

Ilaria Trestini, Lorenzo Belluomini, Alessandra Dodi, Marco Sposito, Alberto Caldart, Dzenete Kadrija, Luca Pasqualin, Silvia Teresa Riva, Ilaria Mariangela Scaglione, Daniela Tregnago and 18 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors.

Ilaria TrestiniDietetic Service, Hospital Medical Direction, University and Hospital Trust (AOUI) of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Lorenzo BelluominiDepartment of Engineering for Innovation Medicine (DIMI), Section of Innovation Biomedicine - Oncology Area, University of Verona and University and Hospital Trust (AOUI) of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Alessandra DodiDepartment of Engineering for Innovation Medicine (DIMI), Section of Innovation Biomedicine - Oncology Area, University of Verona and University and Hospital Trust (AOUI) of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Marco SpositoDepartment of Engineering for Innovation Medicine (DIMI), Section of Innovation Biomedicine - Oncology Area, University of Verona and University and Hospital Trust (AOUI) of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Alberto CaldartMedical Oncology Unit, Hospital of Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy.
Dzenete KadrijaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Santa Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy.
Luca PasqualinDepartment of Engineering for Innovation Medicine (DIMI), Section of Innovation Biomedicine - Oncology Area, University of Verona and University and Hospital Trust (AOUI) of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Silvia Teresa RivaDepartment of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Ilaria Mariangela ScaglioneDepartment of Engineering for Innovation Medicine (DIMI), Section of Innovation Biomedicine - Oncology Area, University of Verona and University and Hospital Trust (AOUI) of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Daniela TregnagoDepartment of Engineering for Innovation Medicine (DIMI), Section of Innovation Biomedicine - Oncology Area, University of Verona and University and Hospital Trust (AOUI) of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Alice AvanciniDepartment of Engineering for Innovation Medicine (DIMI), Section of Innovation Biomedicine - Oncology Area, University of Verona and University and Hospital Trust (AOUI) of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Jessica InsoldaDepartment of Engineering for Innovation Medicine (DIMI), Section of Innovation Biomedicine - Oncology Area, University of Verona and University and Hospital Trust (AOUI) of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Linda ConfortiniDepartment of Engineering for Innovation Medicine (DIMI), Section of Innovation Biomedicine - Oncology Area, University of Verona and University and Hospital Trust (AOUI) of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Miriam CasaliMedical Oncology Unit, Hospital 'ASST di Lodi', Lodi, Italy.
Jessica MenisDepartment of Engineering for Innovation Medicine (DIMI), Section of Innovation Biomedicine - Oncology Area, University of Verona and University and Hospital Trust (AOUI) of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Emanuele VitaDepartment of Traslational Medicine and Surgery, Medical Oncology Unit, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Marco CintoniDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Department of Translational Medicine and Surgery, Clinical Nutrition Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Research and Training Center in Human Nutrition, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Marco TodescoDepartment of Radiology, University of Verona and University and Hospital Trust (AOUI) of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Gianluca MilaneseDepartment of Medicine and Surgery (DiMeC), Section of Radiology, Unit of Surgical Sciences, University of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Isabella SperdutiBiostatistics Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy.
Mirko D'OnofrioDepartment of Radiology, University of Verona and University and Hospital Trust (AOUI) of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Marco InfanteSection of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders, UniCamillus, Saint Camillus International University of Health Sciences, Rome, Italy.
Marcello TiseoDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Parma, Italy; Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Parma, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Maria Cristina MeleDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Department of Translational Medicine and Surgery, Clinical Nutrition Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Research and Training Center in Human Nutrition, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Giampaolo TortoraDepartment of Traslational Medicine and Surgery, Medical Oncology Unit, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Michele MilellaDepartment of Engineering for Innovation Medicine (DIMI), Section of Innovation Biomedicine - Oncology Area, University of Verona and University and Hospital Trust (AOUI) of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Emilio BriaUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, Rome, Italy.
Sara PilottoDepartment of Engineering for Innovation Medicine (DIMI), Section of Innovation Biomedicine - Oncology Area, University of Verona and University and Hospital Trust (AOUI) of Verona, Verona, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2229-4874

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are increasingly reshaping the therapeutic landscape of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), only a limited proportion of patients achieve a relevant and long-lasting benefit with these treatments, calling for the identification of clinical and, ideally modifiable, predictors of efficacy. Body composition phenotypes may reflect aspects of patients' immunology and thereby their ability to respond to ICIs. This study aims to explore the possible association between pre-treatment body composition phenotypes, tumour response, and clinical outcomes in patients receiving first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy for advanced NSCLC.

methodsA retrospective review of consecutive patients with treatment-naïve NSCLC and PD-L1 expression ≥50% undergoing pembrolizumab at three academic institutions was performed. Pre-treatment body composition parameters were measured at the third lumbar vertebra level by computed tomography, defined using pre-established cut-offs. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), secondary endpoints progression-free survival and overall survival (PFS and OS), compared through the log-rank test and the Cox proportional hazards model.

resultsData from 134 patients (93 males [69.4%] and 41 females [30.6%]) were collected. Median age was 69 years (range 36-85), with a median follow-up of 12 months (range 1-131). The median body mass index (BMI) was 24.5 (IQR 21.5; 26.1) kg/m

conclusionsSkeletal muscle abnormalities, apparently frequent in NSCLC, potentially represent intriguing predictive markers of response to ICIs and survival outcomes. Large prospective trials are needed to validate ICIs responders' clinical biomarkers.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedBody CompositionLung NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalpembrolizumabBody compositionImmunotherapyIntermuscular adipose tissueNon‐small‐cell lung cancerSarcopenia

Identifiers

PMID39439222
PMCPMC11634481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.