ReviewExpert review of proteomics2024
Optimization of glycopeptide enrichment techniques for the identification of clinical biomarkers.
Review in Expert review of proteomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics Methods for Systematic Identification and Quantification of Protein O-Glycosylation in Complex Biological Samples.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2026Review
- Alteration of Metabolic Profile in Patients with Narcolepsy Type 1.Metabolites · 2025Article
- Metaproteomics in the One Health framework for unraveling microbial effectors in microbiomes.Microbiome · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe identification and characterization of glycopeptides through LC-MS/MS and advanced enrichment techniques are crucial for advancing clinical glycoproteomics, significantly impacting the discovery of disease biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Despite progress in enrichment methods like Lectin Affinity Chromatography (LAC), Hydrophilic Interaction Liquid Chromatography (HILIC), and Electrostatic Repulsion Hydrophilic Interaction Chromatography (ERLIC), issues with specificity, efficiency, and scalability remain, impeding thorough analysis of complex glycosylation patterns crucial for disease understanding. AREAS COVERED: This review explores the current challenges and innovative solutions in glycopeptide enrichment and mass spectrometry analysis, highlighting the importance of novel materials and computational advances for improving sensitivity and specificity. It outlines the potential future directions of these technologies in clinical glycoproteomics, emphasizing their transformative impact on medical diagnostics and therapeutic strategies. EXPERT OPINION: The application of innovative materials such as Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs), Covalent Organic Frameworks (COFs), functional nanomaterials, and online enrichment shows promise in addressing challenges associated with glycoproteomics analysis by providing more selective and robust enrichment platforms. Moreover, the integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning is revolutionizing glycoproteomics by enhancing the processing and interpretation of extensive data from LC-MS/MS, boosting biomarker discovery, and improving predictive accuracy, thus supporting personalized medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.