ArticleJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2024
Double innominate vein in a case with double aortic arch: a case report.
Article in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDouble aortic arch (DAA) is a type of vascular ring, causing stridor and dysphagia owing to compression of the trachea and esophagus. In contrast, double innominate veins, which is a relatively rare venous anomaly, usually does not cause symptoms or require intervention. CASE PRESENTATION: A 2 month-old boy presented with mild stridor and a hoarse voice while crying, and was diagnosed as having DAA, small atrial septal defects and double innominate vein. The double innominate veins, crossing over and underneath the ascending aorta, did not contribute to airway compression. To release the narrow vascular ring caused by the DAA, surgical resection of the atretic side of the arch was performed by lateral thoracostomy at 4 months of age, before the appearance of signs of bronchomalacia. The double innominate veins were left untouched, and open-heart surgery was avoided.
conclusionsDAA should be suspected if airway symptoms are present in early infancy, particularly if a right aortic arch is noted. It is important not to hesitate to perform diagnostic imaging and release the DAA, as this might prevent or minimize airway complications. However, for double innominate veins, operative release is not necessary unless it interferes with surgical procedures or is causing symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.