Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39438985›Full record

ArticleNeurological research and practice2024

Cognitive recovery of post critical care patients with and without COVID-19: differences and similarities, an observational study.

Anna Gorsler, Christiana Franke, Anneke Quitschau, Nadine Külzow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological research and practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anna GorslerClinic for Neurological Rehabilitation, Fachklinik Für Neurologische Frührehabilitation, Kliniken Beelitz GmbH, Paracelsusring 6a, Beelitz-Heilstätten, 14547, Brandenburg, Germany. gorsler@kliniken-beelitz.de.
Christiana FrankeDepartment of Neurology and Experimental Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Anneke QuitschauDepartment of Neurology and Experimental Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Nadine KülzowClinic for Neurological Rehabilitation, Fachklinik Für Neurologische Frührehabilitation, Kliniken Beelitz GmbH, Paracelsusring 6a, Beelitz-Heilstätten, 14547, Brandenburg, Germany. kuelzow@kliniken-beelitz.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4549-8343

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCoronavirus disease (COVID-19) patients treated in an intensive care unit (ICU) are at high risk of developing cognitive impairments of a "post-intensive care syndrome" (PICS). We explored whether critically ill COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 survivors differ in their post-ICU recovery course in terms of severity and affected cognitive domains.

methodsAn observational prospective study was conducted in a German post-acute neurological early rehabilitation clinic. Critically ill patients with or without SARS-CoV-2 infection (at least mechanically ventilated for one week) underwent repeated standardized assessments during their subsequent inpatient rehabilitation stay. Cognitive functions (information processing speed, learning, recognition, short-term and working-memory, word fluency, flexibility) assigned to different domains (attention, memory, executive functions) were assessed as primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included mental (depression, anxiety) and physical (Barthel index, modified ranking scale) state.

resultsOut of 92 eligible patients (screened between June 2021 and August 2023), 34 were examined, and 30 were available for analysis (15 per group). Both groups were ventilated for a similar period (COVID-19 vs. Non-COVID-19: median: 48 vs. 53 days). Patients of COVID-19 group spend on average 10 days longer at ICU and developed slightly more complications, but subsequent inpatient rehabilitation was of comparable duration (median: 36.5 vs. 37 days). On the group-level both groups showed similar cognitive dysfunctions with striking impairments (normative T-scores < 41) in information processing speed, word fluency, flexibility, and recognition memory on admission. Significant gains until discharge were only revealed for information processing speed in both groups (main effect visit, mean difference [95%CI] - 7.5 [- 13.1, - 2.0]). Physical and mental state were also similarly affected in both groups on admission, but improved over time, indicating that overall recovery for higher-order cognitive functions is slowest. Interestingly, majority of patients stated correctly being still physically disabled, while a discrepancy was found between subjective and objective evaluation of cognitive health.

conclusionsResults suggest a substantial overlap of cognitive, mental and physical dysfunction in post-acute recovery of ICU survivors independent of SARS-CoV-2 infection which warrants further monitoring to reduce the risk of long-term burden and enable a return to previous functionality.

trial registrationRetrospectively registered at https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00025523 , 21.06.2021.

Indexed as

Cognitive impairmentCOVID-19Intensive care unitPICSRecoveryRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID39438985
PMCPMC11495021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.