ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2024
Combined lung and diaphragm ultrasound predicts extubation outcomes in ARDS: a prospective study.
Article in European journal of medical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Association Between Diaphragm Ultrasound Measures and Extubation Outcomes in Neonates: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Pediatric pulmonology · 2026Pooled it
- The predictive value of newborn and infant lung ultrasound score for mechanical ventilation needs: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Pooled it
- Application of bedside ultrasound assessment of diaphragmatic function in preparing tracheostomised patients for ventilator liberation and decannulation: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Ultrasonographic predictors of extubation success in children: diaphragmatic, lung, and laryngeal assessment-a prospective pilot cohort study.European journal of pediatrics · 2025Article
- Association Between Heparin-Binding Protein and Extubation Outcomes in ARDS: A Retrospective Cohort Study.International journal of general medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundExtubation failure is a crucial issue for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Ultrasound of the lung and diaphragm is individually valuable for predicting extubation outcomes. We aimed to determine whether combined lung and diaphragmatic ultrasound could improve the accuracy of predicting the extubation of ARDS patients.
methodsThis was a prospective cohort study of ARDS patients who were ready for extubation. The lung ultrasound score (LUS), diaphragmatic displacement (DD), diaphragm thickening fraction (DTF), and diaphragmatic-rapid shallow breathing index (D-RSBI) were measured at the end of the spontaneous breathing trial. The primary outcome was extubation success. Logistic regression was used to combine these indicators, and the predictive performance of the single and combined indicators was evaluated through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, the Hosmer-Lemeshow Ĉ-test, and the Brier score. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the association between combined ultrasound indicators and extubation success.
resultsThis study enrolled 132 eligible patients from January 2019 to December 2022. A total of 71% (94/132) of patients were successfully extubated from mechanical ventilation. The combination of LUS and D-RSBI had the largest area under the ROC curves, the lowest Brier score, and the greatest calibration. After formula transformation, LUS + 2.43 × D-RSBI ≤ 14.273 was significantly associated with extubation success in ARDS patients.
conclusionsIn ARDS patients receiving mechanical ventilation, the combination of LUS and D-RSBI was more accurate than a single parameter alone in predicting extubation outcomes. This combined approach could help refine extubation protocols in critical care. Clinical trial registration This study is registered online with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR), http://www.chictr.org.cn , ChiCTR1800019340 (Registration time: 2018/11/06).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.