Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39438906›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of surgical oncology2024

Meta-analysis of prediction models for predicting lymph node metastasis in thyroid cancer.

Feng Liu, Fei Han, Lifang Lu, Yizhang Chen, Zhen Guo, Jingchun Yao

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of surgical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Feng Liu *Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Shanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital, Shanxi Hospital Cancer Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Taiyuan, 031000, Shanxi Province, China.
Fei Han *Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Shanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital, Shanxi Hospital Cancer Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Taiyuan, 031000, Shanxi Province, China.
Lifang LuDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, Shanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital, Shanxi Hospital Cancer Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Taiyuan, 031000, Shanxi Province, China.
Yizhang ChenDepartment of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi Province, China.
Zhen GuoDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, Shanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital, Shanxi Hospital Cancer Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Taiyuan, 031000, Shanxi Province, China.
Jingchun YaoDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, Shanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital, Shanxi Hospital Cancer Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Taiyuan, 031000, Shanxi Province, China. Jingchun_yao@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the efficacy of various machine learning (ML) techniques in predicting preoperative lymph node metastasis (LNM) in patients diagnosed with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). Although prior studies have investigated the potential of ML in this context, the current evidence is not sufficiently strong. Hence, we undertook a thorough analysis to ascertain the predictive accuracy of different ML models and their practical relevance in predicting preoperative LNM in PTC patients. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn our search, we thoroughly examined PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science, encompassing their complete database history until December 3rd, 2022. To evaluate the potential bias in the machine learning models documented in the included studies, we employed the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST).

resultsA total of 107 studies, involving 136,245 patients, were included. Among them, 21,231 patients showed central LNM (CLNM) and 4,637 had lateral LNM (LLNM). The meta-analysis results revealed that the c-index for predicting LNM, CLNM, and LLNM were 0.762 (95% CI: 0.747-0.777), 0.762 (95% CI: 0.747-0.777), and 0.803 (95% CI: 0.773-0.834) in the training set, and 0.773 (95% CI: 0.754-0.791), 0.762 (95% CI: 0.747-0.777), and 0.829 (95% CI: 0.779-0.879) in the validation set, respectively. A total of 134 machine learning-based prediction models were included, covering 10 different types. Logistic Regression (LR) was the most commonly used model, accounting for 81.34% (109/134) of the included models.

conclusionsMachine learning methods have shown a certain level of accuracy in predicting preoperative LNM in PTC patients, indicating their potential as a predictive tool. Their use in the clinical management of PTC holds great promise. Among the various ML models investigated, the performance of logistic regression-based nomograms was deemed satisfactory.

Indexed as

Lymphatic MetastasisMachine LearningThyroid Cancer, PapillaryThyroid NeoplasmsHumansLymph NodesPrognosisCervical lymph nodeLymph node metastasisMachine learningPapillary thyroid carcinomaPrediction modelPrognostic model

Identifiers

PMID39438906
PMCPMC11494801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.