Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39438898›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2024

Anaerostipes caccae CML199 enhances bone development and counteracts aging-induced bone loss through the butyrate-driven gut-bone axis: the chicken model.

Zhengtian Lyu, Gaoxiang Yuan, Yuying Zhang, Fengwenhui Zhang, Yan Liu, Yifan Li, Guang Li, Ying Wang, Ming Zhang, Yongfei Hu and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Optimizing eggshell quality in extended laying periods: Insights and strategies.Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Influence of Different Litter Regimens on Ceca Microbiota Profiles inAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Zhengtian LyuState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Gaoxiang YuanState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Yuying ZhangState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Fengwenhui ZhangState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Yan LiuState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Yifan LiState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Guang LiState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Ying WangSichuan Tieqilishi Industrial Co., Ltd, Mianyang, 621010, China.
Ming ZhangSichuan Tieqilishi Industrial Co., Ltd, Mianyang, 621010, China.
Yongfei HuState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
Yuming GuoState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China. guoyum@cau.edu.cn.
Dan LiuState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China. liud@cau.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe gut microbiota is a key regulator of bone metabolism. Investigating the relationship between the gut microbiota and bone remodeling has revealed new avenues for the treatment of bone-related disorders. Despite significant progress in understanding gut microbiota-bone interactions in mammals, research on avian species remains limited. Birds have unique bone anatomy and physiology to support egg-laying. However, whether and how the gut microbiota affects bone physiology in birds is still unknown. In this study, we utilized laying hens as a research model to analyze bone development patterns, elucidate the relationships between bone and the gut microbiota, and mine probiotics with osteomodulatory effects.

resultsAging led to a continuous increase in bone mineral density in the femur of laying hens. The continuous deposition of medullary bone in the bone marrow cavity of aged laying hens led to significant trabecular bone loss and weakened bone metabolism. The cecal microbial composition significantly shifted before and after sexual maturity, with some genera within the class Clostridia potentially linked to postnatal bone development in laying hens. Four bacterial strains associated with bone development, namely Blautia coccoides CML164, Fournierella sp002159185 CML151, Anaerostipes caccae CML199 (ANA), and Romboutsia lituseburensis CML137, were identified and assessed in chicks with low bacterial loads and chicken primary osteoblasts. Among these, ANA demonstrated the most significant promotion of bone formation both in vivo and in vitro, primarily attributed to butyrate in its fermentation products. A long-term feeding experiment of up to 72 weeks confirmed that ANA enhanced bone development during sexual maturity by improving the immune microenvironment of the bone marrow in laying hens. Dietary supplementation of ANA for 50 weeks prevented excessive medullary bone deposition and mitigated aging-induced trabecular bone loss.

conclusionsThese findings highlight the beneficial effects of ANA on bone physiology, offering new perspectives for microbial-based interventions for bone-related disorders in both poultry and possibly extending to human health. Video Abstract.

Indexed as

AgingBone DevelopmentButyratesChickensGastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsBacteriaBone and BonesBone DensityFemaleFemurProbioticsButyratesAnaerostipes caccaeBone remodelingButyrateGut microbiotaLaying hens

Identifiers

PMID39438898
PMCPMC11495078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.