Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39438887›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2024

A qualitative study on rehabilitation services at primary health care: insights from primary health care stakeholders in low-resource contexts.

Maria Y Charumbira, Farayi Kaseke, Thandi Conradie, Karina Berner, Quinette A Louw

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Physical rehabilitation delivery by community health workers: Views of the users and caregivers.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maria Y CharumbiraDivision of Physiotherapy, Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa. yvonne.kamuti@gmail.com.
Farayi KasekeDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Thandi ConradieDivision of Physiotherapy, Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
Karina BernerDivision of Physiotherapy, Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
Quinette A LouwDivision of Physiotherapy, Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.

Funding

Medical Research Council of South Africa SU-PT-15/10-000005National Research Foundation Chair Initiative UID 115461
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe chasm between rehabilitation needs and available rehabilitation services is widening. In most low-resource contexts, there are inadequate rehabilitation professionals at primary health care (PHC), leaving nonrehabilitation primary care providers' (PCPs) and district rehabilitation professionals and managers to address patients' rehabilitation needs. This study explored rehabilitation and non-rehabilitation PCPs' and managers' perspectives on the situation of rehabilitation service provision in PHC settings and the challenges experienced in providing rehabilitation care.

methodsIn this descriptive, exploratory qualitative study, individual semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions were conducted with purposefully sampled PCPs in Manicaland, Zimbabwe and Eastern Cape, South Africa. The transcripts were analysed thematically using Atlas.ti. version 22.2

resultsThirty-six PCPs (29 nonrehabilitation and 7 rehabilitation) and one district manager participated in the study. The current PHC rehabilitation services in the two low-resource contexts were described as inadequate, if not nonexistent. District rehabilitation professionals attempted to fill the gap through outreach and home visits, but resource limitations, particularly in Zimbabwe, often hampered this strategy. The nonrehabilitation PCPs took on task-shifting roles in the identification, referral, and education of patients with rehabilitation needs in the absence of rehabilitation professionals at PHC. Challenges encountered in providing rehabilitation care at PHC included unsupportive leadership, human resource shortages, lack of comprehensive PHC rehabilitation guidelines, no or delayed rehabilitation referral, lack of clear communication strategies, and users' low demand for PHC rehabilitation.

conclusionTailored approaches, including context-specific rehabilitation guidance for existing task-shifting models, increased investment in rehabilitation and increased rehabilitation awareness, are needed to establish basic rehabilitation services in the described contexts because they are mostly absent. Importantly, the PHC systems in which rehabilitation is to be nested need to be strengthened.

Indexed as

Focus GroupsPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchAdultFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedRehabilitationSouth AfricaZimbabweLow-resource settingsPrimary health careQualitativeRehabilitationSouth AfricaZimbabwe

Identifiers

PMID39438887
PMCPMC11515710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.