ArticleBMC medical education2024
Exploring the influence of a massive open online course (MOOC) for preparing rehabilitation professionals to meet the needs of forcibly displaced persons.
Article in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo assist in the global training of rehabilitation professionals to address the unique needs of forcibly displaced persons, a free massive open online course (MOOC) was developed. This study aimed to explore self-perceived knowledge following completion of courses within the MOOC, ability to implement changes in practice, and participant engagement with the MOOC content.
methodsThe Kirkpatrick Model was used to assess the effectiveness of the course with a focus on reaction, learning, and behavior. Participant interaction with the course content was explored using thematic analysis of the MOOC's discussion forum content. Participants in the MOOC were asked to complete pre and post-surveys of self-perceived knowledge regarding the rehabilitation of displaced persons. Mean within-subject pre and post-MOOC data were compared using the Mann U Whitney test. Knowledge implementation after six months was assessed with a follow-up survey.
resultsSelf-reported knowledge following completion of the MOOC improved significantly on individual survey questions (p≤.004) as well as composite score (p < .001). Six months following completion of the course, participants noted the ability to implement multiple strategies into practice. Three themes emerged from the discussion forum postings: (1) Understanding the persons lived experience to provide effective, holistic, patient-centered care, (2) Communication to develop a sense of connection and facilitate the provision of quality care, and (3) The importance of culturally responsive practice.
conclusionThe MOOC effectively delivered the fundamental knowledge to address the complex needs of displaced individuals among a diverse group of practicing rehabilitation professionals and can play a role in preparing the rehabilitation workforce for increased population displacement, alongside specialist programs in related themes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.