Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39438836›Full record

ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2024

Machine learning predictive models and risk factors for lymph node metastasis in non-small cell lung cancer.

Bo Wu, Yihui Zhu, Zhuozheng Hu, Jiajun Wu, Weijun Zhou, Maoyan Si, Xiying Cao, Zhicheng Wu, Wenxiong Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Predictive value of primary tumorCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Bo WuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Yihui ZhuSchool of Data Science, Chinese University of Hong Kong (Shenzhen), Shenzhen, China.
Zhuozheng HuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Jiajun WuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Weijun ZhouDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.
Maoyan SiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, 23 Qingnian Road, Zhanggong District, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, 341000, China.
Xiying CaoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, 23 Qingnian Road, Zhanggong District, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, 341000, China.
Zhicheng WuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, 23 Qingnian Road, Zhanggong District, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, 341000, China. wuzc177@163.com.
Wenxiong ZhangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China.

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province 20212BAB206050
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is substantially affected by lymph node metastasis (LNM), but there are no noninvasive, inexpensive methods of relatively high accuracy available to predict LNM in NSCLC patients.

methodsClinical data on NSCLC patients were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Risk factors for LNM were recognized LASSO and multivariate logistic regression. Six predictive models were constructed with machine learning based on risk factors. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to assess the performance of the model. Subgroup analysis with different T-stages was performed on an optimal model. A webpage LNM risk calculator for optimal model was built using the Shinyapps.io platform.

resultsWe enrolled 64,012 NSCLC patients, of whom 26,611 (41.57%) had LNM. Using multivariate logistic regression, we finally identified 10 independent risk factors for LNM: age, sex, race, histology, primary site, grade, T stage, M stage, tumor size, and bone metastases. GLM is the optimal model among all six machine learning models in both the training and validation cohorts. Subgroup analyses revealed that GLM has good predictability for populations with different T staging. A webpage LNM risk calculator based on GLM was posted on the shinyapps.io platform ( https://wubopredict.shinyapps.io/dynnomapp/ ).

conclusionThe predictive model based on GLM can be used to precisely predict the probability of LNM in NSCLC patients, which was proven effective in all subgroup analyses according to T staging.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsLymphatic MetastasisMachine LearningNeoplasm StagingSEER ProgramAdultAgedFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRisk FactorsGeneralized linear modelLymph node metastasisMachine learningNon-small cell lung cancerRisk factorsSEER

Identifiers

PMID39438836
PMCPMC11515794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.