Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39438815›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2024

Molecular identification and antimicrobial resistance patterns of enterobacterales in community urinary tract infections among indigenous women in Ecuador: addressing microbiological misidentification.

Carlos Bastidas-Caldes, Fernanda Hernández-Alomía, Miguel Almeida, Mirian Ormaza, Josué Boada, Jay Graham, Manuel Calvopiña, Pablo Castillejo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Carlos Bastidas-Caldes *One Health Research Group, Facultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias Aplicadas, Ingeniería en Biotecnología, Universidad de Las Américas 170125, Quito, Ecuador.
Fernanda Hernández-Alomía *Grupo de Investigación en Biodiversidad, Ingeniería en Biotecnología, Medio Ambiente y Salud (BIOMAS), Universidad de Las Américas 170125, Quito, Ecuador.
Miguel AlmeidaCentro Médico de Orientación y Planificación Familiar (CEMOPLAF), Quito, 100201, Otavalo, Ecuador.
Mirian OrmazaCentro Médico de Orientación y Planificación Familiar (CEMOPLAF), Quito, 100201, Otavalo, Ecuador.
Josué BoadaGrupo de Investigación en Biodiversidad, Ingeniería en Biotecnología, Medio Ambiente y Salud (BIOMAS), Universidad de Las Américas 170125, Quito, Ecuador.
Jay GrahamBerkeley School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 94607, USA.
Manuel CalvopiñaOne Health Research Group, Facultad de Ingeniería y Ciencias Aplicadas, Ingeniería en Biotecnología, Universidad de Las Américas 170125, Quito, Ecuador.
Pablo CastillejoGrupo de Investigación en Biodiversidad, Ingeniería en Biotecnología, Medio Ambiente y Salud (BIOMAS), Universidad de Las Américas 170125, Quito, Ecuador. pablo.castillejo@udla.edu.ec.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntibiotic resistance of Enterobacterales poses a major challenge in the treatment of urinary tract infections (UTIs). In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), standard microbiological (i.e. urine culture and simple disk diffusion test) methods are considered the "gold standard" for bacterial identification and drug susceptibility testing, while PCR and DNA sequencing are less commonly used. In this study, we aimed to re-identifying Enterobacterales as the primary bacterial agents responsible for urinary tract infections (UTIs) by comparing the sensitivity and specificity of traditional microbiological methods with advanced molecular techniques for the detection of uropathogens in indigenous women from Otavalo, Ecuador.

methodsA facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted from October 2021 to February 2022 among Kichwa-Otavalo women. Pathogens from urine samples were identified using culture and biochemical typing. Morphological identification was doble-checked through PCR and DNA sequencing of 16S, recA, and rpoB molecular barcodes. The isolates were subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility-testing using disk diffusion test.

resultsThis study highlighted a 32% misidentification rate between biochemical and molecular identification. Using traditional methods, E. coli was 26.19% underrepresented meanwhile Klebsiella oxytoca was overrepresented by 92.86%. Furthermore, the genera Pseudomonas, Proteus, and Serratia were confirmed to be E. coli and Klebsiella spp. by molecular method, and one Klebsiella spp. was reidentified as Enterobacter spp. The susceptibility profile showed that 59% of the isolates were multidrug resistant strains and 31% produced extended spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs). Co-trimoxazole was the least effective antibiotic with 61% of the isolates resistant. Compared to previous reports, resistance to nitrofurantoin and fosfomycin showed an increase in resistance by 25% and 15%, respectively.

conclusionsCommunity-acquired UTIs in indigenous women in Otavalo were primarily caused by E. coli and Klebsiella spp. Molecular identification (16S/rpoB/recA) revealed a high rate of misidentification by standard biochemical and microbiological techniques, which could lead to incorrect antibiotic prescriptions. UTI isolates in this population displayed higher levels of resistance to commonly used antibiotics compared with non-indigenous groups. Accurate identification of pathogens causing UTIs and their antibiotic susceptibility in local populations is important for local antibiotic prescribing guidelines.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsUrinary Tract InfectionsAdultCommunity-Acquired InfectionsCross-Sectional StudiesDrug Resistance, BacterialEcuadorEnterobacteriaceaeEnterobacteriaceae InfectionsFemaleHumansIndigenous PeoplesMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedYoung AdultAnti-Bacterial Agents16S rRNAE. coliIndigenous womenRecARpoBShigella spp.UTI

Identifiers

PMID39438815
PMCPMC11515717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.