ArticleInternational journal of emergency medicine2024
Validating the GO-FAR score: predicting in-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes in the Middle East.
Article in International journal of emergency medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- In-hospitalWorld journal of critical care medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND
aimExternal validations of the Good Outcome Following Attempted Resuscitation (GO-FAR) score have been in populations where Do Not Attempt Resuscitation (DNAR) is practised. We aim to externally validate the GO-FAR score in a population without a DNAR order.
methodsWe studied patients ≥ 18 years old who had an In-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) with known outcomes at Al Ain Hospital from January 2017 to December 2019, excluding those who died in the emergency department. Studied variables included demography, location, response time, code duration, initial rhythm, primary diagnosis, admission vital signs, GO FAR score variables, discharge status, and functional outcomes as determined by the cerebral performance category score ranging from 1 (good cerebral performance) to 5 (brain death).
results366 patients were studied; 66.7% were males. The median (IQR) age was 70 (55-81) years. Cardiac and respiratory causes were the primary diagnoses in 89 (24.6%) and 67 (18.5%), respectively. IHCA occurred in critical areas such as the intensive care unit, high dependency unit and coronary care unit in 206 (80.8%) patients. The majority, 308 (91.8%), had a non-shockable rhythm, and a return of spontaneous circulation was achieved in 159 (43.4%) of the patients. Thirty-one (8.5%) patients survived to hospital discharge, and 20 (5.5%) patients had cerebral performance category scores of 1 and 2. The area under the curve of the ROC for survival to discharge with good functional outcome was 0.74 (95% CI 0.59-0.88). The best cut-off point for predicting survival with a good neurological outcome was a GO-FAR score of < 4, having a sensitivity of 0.81, a specificity of 0.7, a positive likelihood ratio of 2.7 and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.27.
conclusionsA GO-FAR score of less than 4 predicts survival with a good neurological outcome in a healthcare system with an all-inclusive patient population with no DNAR practice.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.