ArticleScientific reports2024
Understanding CO adsorption in MOFs combining atomic simulations and machine learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- State-of-the-Art, Insights, and Perspectives for MOFs-Nanocomposites and MOF-Derived (Nano)Materials.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025Review
- A data driven machine learning approach for predicting and optimizing sulfur compound adsorption on metal organic frameworks.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study introduces a computational method integrating molecular simulations and machine learning (ML) to assess the CO adsorption capacities of synthesized and hypothetical metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) at various pressures. After extracting structural, chemical, and energy-based features of the synthesized and hypothetical MOFs (hMOFs), we conducted molecular simulations to compute CO adsorption in synthesized MOFs and used these simulation results to train ML models for predicting CO adsorption in hMOFs. Results showed that CO uptakes of synthesized MOFs and hMOFs are between 0.02-2.28 mol/kg and 0.45-3.06 mol/kg, respectively, at 1 bar, 298 K. At low pressures (0.1 and 1 bar), Henry's constant of CO is the most dominant feature, whereas structural properties such as surface area and porosity are more influential for determining the CO uptakes of MOFs at high pressure (10 bar). Structural and chemical analyses revealed that MOFs with narrow pores (4.4-7.3 Å), aromatic ring-containing linkers and carboxylic acid groups, along with metal nodes such as Co, Zn, Ni achieve high CO uptakes at 1 bar. Our approach evaluated the CO uptakes of ~ 100,000 MOFs, the most extensive and diverse set studied for CO capture thus far, as a robust alternative to computationally demanding molecular simulations and iterative experiments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.