Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39438709›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Understanding CO adsorption in MOFs combining atomic simulations and machine learning.

Goktug Ercakir, Gokhan Onder Aksu, Seda Keskin

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Goktug ErcakirDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Koç University, Rumelifeneri Yolu, Sariyer, 34450, Istanbul, Turkey.
Gokhan Onder AksuDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Koç University, Rumelifeneri Yolu, Sariyer, 34450, Istanbul, Turkey.
Seda KeskinDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Koç University, Rumelifeneri Yolu, Sariyer, 34450, Istanbul, Turkey. skeskin@ku.edu.tr.

Funding

EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council) European Union (ERC, STARLET, 101124002)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study introduces a computational method integrating molecular simulations and machine learning (ML) to assess the CO adsorption capacities of synthesized and hypothetical metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) at various pressures. After extracting structural, chemical, and energy-based features of the synthesized and hypothetical MOFs (hMOFs), we conducted molecular simulations to compute CO adsorption in synthesized MOFs and used these simulation results to train ML models for predicting CO adsorption in hMOFs. Results showed that CO uptakes of synthesized MOFs and hMOFs are between 0.02-2.28 mol/kg and 0.45-3.06 mol/kg, respectively, at 1 bar, 298 K. At low pressures (0.1 and 1 bar), Henry's constant of CO is the most dominant feature, whereas structural properties such as surface area and porosity are more influential for determining the CO uptakes of MOFs at high pressure (10 bar). Structural and chemical analyses revealed that MOFs with narrow pores (4.4-7.3 Å), aromatic ring-containing linkers and carboxylic acid groups, along with metal nodes such as Co, Zn, Ni achieve high CO uptakes at 1 bar. Our approach evaluated the CO uptakes of ~ 100,000 MOFs, the most extensive and diverse set studied for CO capture thus far, as a robust alternative to computationally demanding molecular simulations and iterative experiments.

Indexed as

AdsorptionCarbon monoxide (CO)Machine learningMetal–organic framework (MOF)Molecular simulation

Identifiers

PMID39438709
PMCPMC11496673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.