Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39438685›Full record

ReviewNature human behaviour2024

A new sociology of humans and machines.

Milena Tsvetkova, Taha Yasseri, Niccolo Pescetelli, Tobias Werner

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature human behaviour, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Group size effects and collective misalignment in LLM multi-agent systems.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Tree-Based Methods to Predict Enzyme Inhibition.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. AI-enhanced collective intelligence.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Milena TsvetkovaDepartment of Methodology, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK. m.tsvetkova@lse.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3552-108X
Taha YasseriSchool of Sociology, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1800-6094
Niccolo PescetelliCollective Intelligence Lab, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8826-2202
Tobias WernerCenter for Humans and Machines, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2985-2760

Funding

Irish Research Council (An Chomhairle um Thaighde in Éirinn) IRCLA/2022/3217
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

From fake social media accounts and generative artificial intelligence chatbots to trading algorithms and self-driving vehicles, robots, bots and algorithms are proliferating and permeating our communication channels, social interactions, economic transactions and transportation arteries. Networks of multiple interdependent and interacting humans and intelligent machines constitute complex social systems for which the collective outcomes cannot be deduced from either human or machine behaviour alone. Under this paradigm, we review recent research and identify general dynamics and patterns in situations of competition, coordination, cooperation, contagion and collective decision-making, with context-rich examples from high-frequency trading markets, a social media platform, an open collaboration community and a discussion forum. To ensure more robust and resilient human-machine communities, we require a new sociology of humans and machines. Researchers should study these communities using complex system methods; engineers should explicitly design artificial intelligence for human-machine and machine-machine interactions; and regulators should govern the ecological diversity and social co-development of humans and machines.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceSociologyDecision MakingHumansMan-Machine SystemsRoboticsSocial Media

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.