Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39438662›Full record

ReviewLab animal2024

Cauterization of the root of the left coronary artery as a straightforward, large and reproducible ischemic injury model in neonatal mice.

Tianyuan Hu, Bernd K Fleischmann, Mona Malek Mohammadi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Lab animal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tianyuan HuInstitute of Physiology I, Life and Brain Center, Medical Faculty, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Bernd K FleischmannInstitute of Physiology I, Life and Brain Center, Medical Faculty, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany. bernd.fleischmann@uni-bonn.de.ORCID 0000-0002-9202-8363
Mona Malek MohammadiInstitute of Physiology I, Life and Brain Center, Medical Faculty, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany. mona.malekmohammadi@uni-bonn.de.ORCID 0000-0001-8410-7865

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The adult mammalian heart is known to have very limited regenerative capacity, explaining at least in part the frequency of cardiovascular diseases and their impact as the leading cause of death worldwide. By contrast, the neonatal heart has the ability to regenerate upon injury, and the molecular mechanisms underlying this regenerative capacity are intensely investigated to provide novel cues for the repair of the adult heart. However, the existing rodent neonatal injury models-apex resection, left anterior descending artery ligation and cryoinjury-have limitations, such as being technically demanding, yielding a nonphysiological injury type and/or lack of reproducibility. Here we have therefore established a novel ischemic heart injury method in neonatal mice via cauterization of the root of the left coronary artery. This surgical procedure is technically straightforward, requires less than 10 min for completion and yields reproducible, large ischemic lesions (40% of the left ventricle) with low mortality rates (10% of animals). The injury also induces secondary pulmonary hypertension shortly after surgery, allowing to study the response of the right ventricle. Moreover, neonatal mice at postnatal days 1 and 3 display strongly opposing outcomes after the surgery, because of the lack of cardiac regeneration at the later stage. Thus, this new neonatal heart injury model is of great use for mechanistic studies exploring the regeneration of the left ventricle and the adaptation of the right ventricle upon myocardial infarction.

Indexed as

Animals, NewbornCauteryCoronary VesselsDisease Models, AnimalAnimalsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMyocardial IschemiaRegeneration

Identifiers

PMID39438662
PMCPMC11518978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.