Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39438631›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Ecological implications of row width and cultivar selection on rice (Oryza sativa) and barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli).

Noah H Reed, Thomas R Butts, Jason K Norsworthy, Jarrod T Hardke, L Tom Barber, Jason A Bond, Hunter D Bowman, Nick R Bateman, Aurelie M Poncet, Koffi B J Kouame

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Noah H ReedDepartment of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture, Fayetteville, AR, USA.
Thomas R ButtsDepartment of Botany and Plant Pathology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA. buttst@purdue.edu.
Jason K NorsworthyDepartment of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture, Fayetteville, AR, USA.
Jarrod T HardkeDepartment of Crop Soil and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture, Stuttgart, AR, USA.
L Tom BarberDepartment of Crop Soil and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture, Lonoke, AR, USA.
Jason A BondDepartment of Plant and Soil Sciences, Mississippi State University, Delta Research and Extension Center, Stoneville, MS, USA.
Hunter D BowmanDepartment of Plant and Soil Sciences, Mississippi State University, Delta Research and Extension Center, Stoneville, MS, USA.
Nick R BatemanDepartment of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Stuttgart, AR, USA.
Aurelie M PoncetDepartment of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture, Fayetteville, AR, USA.
Koffi B J KouameDepartment of Crop Soil and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture, Lonoke, AR, USA.

Funding

National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2020-70006-32981
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rice (Oryza sativa L.) producers in the Mid-south are experiencing difficulties with herbicide-resistant weeds such as barnyardgrass [Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) P. Beauv.]. As a result, methods that can alter E. crus-galli ecology are needed. This research evaluated the ecological implications of rice cultivar and row widths on crop and E. crus-galli growth. Overall, for E. crus-galli, as the row width increased, greater density, panicle counts, and seed production occurred. Echinochloa crus-galli density was 120% greater in a 38-cm row width than the 13-cm row width at the preflood rice stage. Reduced early-season rice canopy coverage in the wider row widths allowed for increased E. crus-galli densities. At the preharvest stage, E. crus-galli panicle counts were similar for the 13- and 19-cm rows. Row width did not affect rice yield, indicating wider row widths could be feasible agronomically, but additional weed management efforts would be needed because greater ecological advantages were obtained in narrower rows. Less E. crus-galli seed production occurred in competition with hybrid cultivars compared to inbred cultivars. Overall, the standard row width (19-cm) and hybrid cultivars would provide the greatest ecological advantage over E. crus-galli.

Indexed as

EchinochloaOryzaPlant WeedsCrops, AgriculturalHerbicidesSeedsHerbicidesCanopy coverageDensityRemote sensingSeedbankWeed seed production

Identifiers

PMID39438631
PMCPMC11496544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.