ArticleScientific reports2024
Changes in hamstrings' active stiffness during fatigue tasks are modulated by contraction duration rather than intensity.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite the increase in research of hamstring stiffness through the use of ultrasound-based shear wave elastography, the active stiffness of biceps femoris long head (BFlh) and semitendinosus (ST) muscles under fatigue conditions at various contraction intensities has not been sufficiently explored. This study aimed to compare the effects of knee flexor's isometric contraction until exhaustion performed at 20% vs. 40% of maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC), on the active stiffness responses of BFlh and ST. Eighteen recreationally active males performed two experimental sessions. The knee flexors' MVIC was assessed before the fatiguing task, which involved a submaximal isometric contraction until failure at 20% or 40% of MVIC. Active muscle stiffness of the BFlh and ST was assessed using shear wave elastography. BFlh active stiffness remained relatively unaltered at 20% of MVIC, while ST active stiffness decreased from ≅ 91% contraction time (55.79 to 44.52 kPa; p < 0.001). No intramuscular stiffness changes were noted in BFlh (36.02 to 41.36 kPa; p > 0.05) or ST (63.62 to 53.54 kPa; p > 0.05) at 40% of MVIC session. Intermuscular active stiffness at 20% of MVIC differed until 64% contraction time (p < 0.05) whereas, at 40% of MVIC, differences were observed until 33% contraction time (p < 0.05). BFlh/ST ratios were not different between intensities (20%=0.75 ± 0.24 ratio vs. 40%=0.72 ± 0.32 ratio; p > 0.05), but a steeper increase in BFlh/ST ratio was found for 20% (0.004 ± 0.003 ratio/%) compared to 40% (0.001 ± 0.003 ratio/%) of MVIC (p = 0.003). These results suggest that contraction duration could play a major role in inducing changes in hamstrings' mechanical properties during fatigue tasks compared to contraction intensity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.