Trial reportScientific reports2024
Evaluating efficacy and safety of ocrelizumab biosimilar (Xacrel) compared to the originator (Ocrevus) in relapsing multiple sclerosis: a phase III, randomized, equivalency, clinical trial.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04966338 (A Phase III, Randomized, Two-armed, Double-blind, Parallel, Active-controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate Equivalency of the Efficacy and Safety of Ocrelizumab), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase III, Randomized, Two-armed, Double-blind, Parallel, Active-controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate Equivalency of the Efficacy and Safety of Ocrelizumab (CinnaGen, Iran) in Comparison to Reference Product, Ocrevus® (Roche, Switzerland) in Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-Term Clinical and Psychological Efficacy and Safety of Ocrelizumab in People With Multiple Sclerosis: A Real-World Longitudinal Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Impact of ocrelizumab on quality of life, fatigue, and depression among multiple sclerosis patients.Acta neurologica Belgica · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis is an inflammatory demyelinating disease and represents a global health concern. Ocrelizumab, a humanized IgG monoclonal antibody, selectively targets CD20 on B cells and CD20-expressing T cells. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of the biosimilar ocrelizumab candidate (Xacrel) to the originator product (Ocrevus) in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis (RMS) patients. In this randomized trial, patients received either Xacrel or Ocrevus for 96 weeks. The primary endpoint was the equivalency of the medications in reducing the annualized relapse rate (ARR) at week 48. The secondary endpoints included time to the onset of disability progression confirmed at 12 and 24 weeks, the proportion of relapse-free patients, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluations, safety assessments, and immunogenicity over 96 weeks. A total of 170 patients were randomized (1:1 ratio). In the per protocol analysis, the upper and lower limits of 95% two-sided confidence intervals of difference between treatments in the 48-week ARR rate were in the predefined margin of - 0.2 to 0.2 (- 0.002; 95% CI - 0.080 to 0.075). The two products were also comparable in terms of other efficacy parameters, safety, and immunogenicity. The results confirmed that Xacrel is equivalent to Ocrevus in terms of 48-week ARR in RMS patients, with no considerable difference in other efficacy parameters and the safety profile during the 96 weeks. The trial was registered in Iranian registry of clinical trials (IRCT) on 10/06/2019 with the registration number of IRCT20150303021315N13 and in Clinicaltrials.gov on 19/07/2021 with the registration code of NCT04966338.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.