ArticleScientific reports2024
Hybrid deep models for parallel feature extraction and enhanced emotion state classification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A Review of Deep Learning Techniques for EEG-Based Emotion Recognition: Models, Methods, and Datasets.F1000Research · 2025Pooled it
- Classification of Different Motor Imagery Tasks with the Same Limb Using Electroencephalographic Signals.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- An explainable RoBERTa approach to analyzing panic and anxiety sentiment in oral health education YouTube comments.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Enhancing EEG-Based Emotion Detection with Hybrid Models: Insights from DEAP Dataset Applications.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- SVM-enhanced attention mechanisms for motor imagery EEG classification in brain-computer interfaces.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emotions play a vital role in recognizing a person's thoughts and vary significantly with stress levels. Emotion and stress classification have gained considerable attention in robotics and artificial intelligence applications. While numerous methods based on machine learning techniques provide average classification performance, recent deep learning approaches offer enhanced results. This research presents a hybrid deep learning model that extracts features using AlexNet and DenseNet models, followed by feature fusion and dimensionality reduction via Principal Component Analysis (PCA). The reduced features are then classified using a multi-class Support Vector Machine (SVM) to categorize different types of emotions. The proposed model was evaluated using the DEAP and EEG Brainwave datasets, both well-suited for emotion analysis due to their comprehensive EEG signal recordings and diverse emotional stimuli. The DEAP dataset includes EEG signals from 32 participants who watched 40 one-minute music videos, while the EEG Brainwave dataset categorizes emotions into positive, negative, and neutral based on EEG recordings from participants exposed to six different film clips. The proposed model achieved an accuracy of 95.54% and 97.26% for valence and arousal categories in the DEAP dataset, respectively, and 98.42% for the EEG Brainwave dataset. These results significantly outperform existing methods, demonstrating the model's superior performance in terms of precision, recall, F1-score, specificity, and Mathew correlation coefficient. The integration of AlexNet and DenseNet, combined with PCA and multi-class SVM, makes this approach particularly effective for capturing the intricate patterns in EEG data, highlighting its potential for applications in human-computer interaction and mental health monitoring, marking a significant advancement over traditional methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.