ArticleScientific reports2024
Optimization of SVR and CatBoost models using metaheuristic algorithms to assess landslide susceptibility.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- An optimized machine learning approach for reliable design of hybrid FRP-steel-concrete tubular columns.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- An Uncertainty-Aware Temporal Transformer for Probabilistic Interval Modeling in Wind Power Forecasting.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Machine learning guided Box-Behnken design optimized green synthesis of carbon nitride nanoparticles with antioxidant activity and low SH-SY5Y cytotoxicity.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Relationship between landslide susceptibility and social lag in Mexico City: The case of the west periphery.PloS one · 2026Article
- National-scale landslide susceptibility and risk mapping of India using a hybrid data-driven approach.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Development of robust machine learning models to estimate hydrochar higher heating value and yield based upon biomass proximate analysis.Bioresources and bioprocessing · 2025Article
- Machine Learning Approaches for Geospatial Modeling of Urban Land Surface Temperature: Assessing Geographical Compactness, Interpretability, and Causal Inference.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Hydraulic Performance Modeling of Inclined Double Cutoff Walls Beneath Hydraulic Structures Using Optimized Ensemble Machine Learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Predicting CO2 adsorption in KOH-activated biochar using advanced machine learning techniques.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Hybrid metaheuristic optimized Catboost models for construction cost estimation of concrete solid slabs.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Machine learning frameworks to accurately estimate the adsorption of organic materials onto resin and biochar.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Integrating evolutionary algorithms and enhanced-YOLOv8 + for comprehensive apple ripeness prediction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Research on design and control method of active vibration isolation system based on piezoelectric Stewart platform.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A machine learning algorithm to predict treatment effectiveness for Kawasaki disease in China: a retrospective model development and validation study.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, a landslide susceptibility assessment is performed by combining two machine learning regression algorithms (MLRA), such as support vector regression (SVR) and categorical boosting (CatBoost), with two population-based optimization algorithms, such as grey wolf optimizer (GWO) and particle swarm optimization (PSO), to evaluate the potential of a relatively new algorithm and the impact that optimization algorithms can have on the performance of regression models. The Kerala state in India has been chosen as the test site due to the large number of recorded incidents in the recent past. The study started with 18 potential predisposing factors, which were reduced to 14 after a multi-approach feature selection technique. Six susceptibility models were implemented and compared using the machine learning algorithms alone and combining each of them with the two optimization algorithms: SVR, CatBoost, SVR-PSO, CatBoost-PSO, SVR-GWO, and CatBoost-GWO. The resulting maps were validated with an independent dataset. The performance rankings, based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) metric, are as follows: CatBoost-GWO (AUC = 0.910) had the highest performance, followed by CatBoost-PSO (AUC = 0.909), CatBoost (AUC = 0.899), SVR-GWO (AUC = 0.868), SVR-PSO (AUC = 0.858), and SVR (AUC = 0.840). Other validation statistics corroborated these outcomes, and the Friedman and Wilcoxon-signed rank tests verified the statistical significance of the models. Our case study showed that CatBoost outperformed SVR both in case the models were optimized or not; the introduction of optimization algorithms significantly improves the results of machine learning models, with GWO being slightly more effective than PSO. However, optimization cannot drastically alter the results of the model, highlighting the importance of setting up of a rigorous susceptibility model since the early steps of any research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.